These days we can find many dynamic sites which choose .php or javascript to run their sites. Such sites are good enough when we have large information to put up, wherein you data is easily uploaded. This is not the case with Static websites. Its really painstaking task to upload such huge data in static sites. But at the end of the day, is it worth taking those pains? It is believed that static pages are more preferred by google search engines, than the dynamic ones. (that is why static URLs get easily get indexed than Dynamic URLs). However which option is better to go with if content that is put on website is really huge? (please give reasons to support your choice).
Please give your comments considering the fact that the site has huge content to be managed and is updated every now and then.
According to me, Static URL's are best practice in SEO. Please follow the below links for more information, webconfs dot com/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls-article-3.php seomoz dot org/blog/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls-the-best-practice-for-seo-is-still-clear searchenginegenie dot com/Dynamic-URLs-versus-Static-URLs.html
I think the most useful site coded in .html code. And as the html code support all other codes you can use all programming language at the same time.
Hello, For Managing Huge Content go with the Dynamic Site and change the URLs of inner pages. Dynamic sites are also in rank. So, no need to worry about the Dynamic site. You can get the better result. Thanks, Atechnocrat Web Solution
Thanks for your replies. Please support your choice with a valid and lucid reason. Most of you say static URL. Please state your reason of choice. Cite examples if you have any.