you know what stOx, you are full of raicts and you are facist ! And those who lead you to life , and teached you are facist too( kinda your teachers and etc)
Dear oh dear... touched a nerve did we? When you have calmed down, have a go at answering the simple question i asked you.
stOx .. no, not touched nerve.. and sorry for calling you fasict, i did this just to show you how will feel yourself, if someone call you fasict, and call you bad words.
He is right. FEAR should not change a country. I have a feeling that if it were say a anti-Jewish or Catholic film, they would be let in. Why do the Muslims get special treatment?
That makes you a hypocrite, Doesn't it? On one hand you are saying a democratically elected European politician should be banned from a western democracy for saying things that you find offensive and on the other hand you say offensive things specifically to offend. So why do you think you are entitled to go through life never hearing things which you find offensive? And what makes you entitled to offend when Gert Wilders isn't? It does very much sound like you are demanding special treatment for your personal beliefs. Of course, The simple solution would be that anyone who thinks they may be offended by the film refrain from watching it. But that's not the point is it, The point is to prevent everyone else watching it.
you say that , it is just freedom of speech. I am not with insulting, and just said you sorry for that. Did you find it democratically my words ? or did you find them offensive ? the dutch leader was insulting . And he was spreading hates . And as I know it is against constitution to spread hate.
Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan barred on the grounds that his allegedly racist and anti-Semitic views could threaten public order Muslim cleric Dr Yusuf al-Qaradawi refused entry in order to protect community cohesion. He has described suicide bombers as "martyrs" and homosexuality as "a disease" Like I said, it's Britain's usual policy.
Yeah. But, there are things that have changed about this country due to FEAR. And, it is always due to religon. No. Nothing worth commenting about it.
Here is another point of view to fan the flames. http://bnp.org.uk/2009/02/how-the-g...-from-islamists-but-bans-those-who-oppose-it/ The British government are in the wrong with this I think.
so stox and others do you also condemn this conviction Civil servant guilty over anti-Israel outburst British diplomat Rowan Laxton is convicted of 'racial harassment' over his use of strong language in protest at Israel's offensive against the Gaza Strip at the turn of the year. Laxton reportedly used "offensive language against Israel and Jews" after watching a report about the Gaza war on television, while exercising in a gym on January 27. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iaRYs7uJo8StE4qXNC2L35sAr1QA
New, nobody should be arrested, detained or imprisoned for saying anything other than which is intended to incite others to react in a way which would be illegal.
New i just told you my views on being arrested for speaking. If you are having trouble understanding anything other than one word answers you should go and play with your legos.
do you also have problems in giving straight forward answers due to hypocrisy? you and me can have difference standards that what thing 'incites others' and what does not, that I why I asked ..but as always .. hypocrisy so was the person in question "inciting others" or not?
I gave you a straight forward answer, it's hardly my fault if you are having trouble understanding it. Or was you hoping id give a different answer, maybe one you feel equipped to counter, and are now going to ask me the same question over and over again pretending i haven't answered in the hope i'll give you an answer you are capable of countering?