Drip feed your content, or place it all on?

I've always wondered this and never heard anyone discuss it.

I have two niche product sites worth of content and the sites set up and ready to roll with affiliate links, etc...

These are on brand new domains and I have around 20 articles per site.

My question is, should I place all this content on in one go or should I place say 5 and drip feed the rest on a daily, weekly, bi-weekly basis?

I'd add a new article to each site every 3 weeks.

Cheers,
K

 

I never drip feed my sites. No problems so far

 

Google likes fresh and new content, drip feeding is an option. However I would probably stagger this drip feed overtime so it does not look automated.

If your only promoting Amazon products then I would just bang all the content on the blog and then concentrate on SEO.

 

Matt Cutts said in one of his videso that if you do not have like 1000+ articles to add it doesn't matter.
I would add all of your articles at the same time because that means they will have longer time to rank
better in search engines. And it will also help search engines categorize your website easier.

 

From a fresh content stand point, you should gradually throw in one article every other day. You don't want to add all your articles at once; and starve your blog of fresh content.

There's nothing worse than a blog with no fresh content.

Just a thought.

 

But if the content is already pre-written it will not become fresher if you sit on it longer.

 

This.

Fresh content is one of the biggest myths in SEO circles. Publishing more frequently doesn't give you a SEO boost in itself.

 

Well, its better to dripfeed your articles only if they are unique. I tried it on one of my client's site and they site started to rank for its KW within few days with few backlinks. The niche is competitive but he had an EMD.

So conclusion:
DripFeed articles are better then posting all 10 articles at once

~RandomWoman

 

I don't think you can come to that conclusion based on what you experienced. What is an EMD?

 

EMD = Exact Match Domain

I'm working on more sites with the same strategy. Atleast, my thoughts are that drop feeding unique content is better than posting all at once!

 

I'm sure the EMD is helping a bit

 

EMD = Exact Match Domain and dripfeeds work great!

 

Why not add half up front, then drip the rest....

 

According to Matt Cutts there is no difference. And I think Matt knows a little bit more than you.

 

I built few niche product site, and based from my experience, drip-fed sites perform better. I usually set it to post the content every 3-5 days. Hope this helps

 

I remember Terry Kyles stating that you don't have to worry about drip feeding, you can go "all out". However I would suggest dripp feeding to know what types of BLs that benefit you the most.

 

well I think drip feeding your site is more advantageous than posting your articles all at once, it will look more organic and google loves updated sites

 

The thing is, it may or may not help. But it definitely can't hurt. If you had only 2 or 3 articles there would be very little point, but since you have 20 you might as well post ten right away and drip feed the rest. If you drip feed it every week, you might even have more articles to publish when those are done, therefor a constant stream of fresh data. However, the most important thing is that your articles are unique.

 

I think having 20 articles ready to roll puts me in a good position wherby I can place 10 all at once at drip feed the rest, though I think to counter-act the "new domain" effect drip feeding a smaller amount at first would be a good way to go.

Whilst nothing conclusive (which with something like this is to be expected), many thanks for all the input on this guys.