Doubt regarding Google Page Speed Score?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by obscurant1st, Jul 25, 2011.

  1. #1
    I was trying to improve the score on google page speed score. Now I have reached 91/100.
    But now it showing suggestions as
    1. Defer parsing of JavaScript

        410.8KiB of JavaScript is parsed during initial page load. Defer parsing JavaScript to reduce blocking of page rendering.
            http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js (100.5KiB)
            http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yx/r/-zTzCY4nRsr.js (85.8KiB)
            http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.1/jquery.min.js (82.4KiB)
            http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/y3/r/jbHiQwYzYKQ.js (43.5KiB)
            http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/y4/r/eXHcpRoThZn.js (36.5KiB)
            http://www.coolfacts.in/wp-content/plugins/sexybookmarks/spritegen/jquery.shareaholic-publishers-sb.min.js?ver=4.0.4.2 (23.9KiB)
            http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yp/r/XJ-mTyMG8hy.js (14.1KiB)
            http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (9.6KiB)
            http://www.coolfacts.in/wp-includes/js/wp-lists.js?ver=20110521 (6.7KiB)
            http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/y-/r/L8yUExs-fkD.js (3.1KiB)
            http://www.coolfacts.in/wp-includes/js/wp-ajax-response.js?ver=20091119 (1.7KiB)
            http://www.facebook.com/plugins/likebox.php?channel=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%3Fversion%3D3%23cb%3Df23bf9789c%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.coolfacts.in%252Ff3d2cf54e%26relation%3Dparent.parent%26transport%3Dpostmessage&colorscheme=light&header=false&height=258&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fcoolfact&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&show_faces=true&stream=false&width=260 (1.3KiB of inline JavaScript)
            http://www.coolfacts.in/ (1.3KiB of inline JavaScript)
            http://www.coolfacts.in/wp-includes/js/l10n.js?ver=20101110 (286B)
    
    Code (markup):
    2.Leverage browser caching
        The following cacheable resources have a short freshness lifetime. Specify an expiration at least one week in the future for the following resources:
            http://static.contactme.com/widgets/tab/v1/tab.js (expiration not specified)
            http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/follow_me-c.png (expiration not specified)
            http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js (16.4 minutes)
            http://intensedebate.com/js/wordpressTemplateLinkWrapper2.php?acct=b4784552cb67e5f715bd07ea39d43c0d (60 minutes)
            http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js (60 minutes)
            http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js (2 hours)
            http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/expansion_embed.js (24 hours)
            http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/276030_704880542_4867266_q.jpg (29.3 hours)
            http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/276255_100002676875433_6964418_q.jpg (3.3 days)
            http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/274546_100000932711046_1168214_q.jpg (6 days)
    
    Code (markup):
    Actually what can ido for these things? I don't have a clue. i tried editing the values for expiry in .htaccess file, but nothing seems to be happening for these listed things.

    My platform is wordpress and I use w3 total cache plugin!
     
    obscurant1st, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  2. no69_2007

    no69_2007 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #2
    this plugin generate a lot of loads, that is what I guess : - w3 total cache plugin!
     
    no69_2007, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  3. obscurant1st

    obscurant1st Active Member

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #3
    i didn't get you! :/
     
    obscurant1st, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  4. jvfconsulting

    jvfconsulting Active Member

    Messages:
    1,089
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #4
    A 91/100 is damn good!
     
    jvfconsulting, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  5. obscurant1st

    obscurant1st Active Member

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #5
    thanks! :)
     
    obscurant1st, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  6. revium

    revium Member

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    #6
    I think it is virtually impossible to get a 100/100 score unless it is a straight text page with no included files.

    I think you are in good shape with a 91/100 score as long as you have seen improvements in the overall speed of your site.
     
    revium, Jul 25, 2011 IP
  7. obscurant1st

    obscurant1st Active Member

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #7
    oh, ok! Thanks.
    I thought of correcting the errors shown in the suggestions.
    And when I take the page speed test(not in google speed score) its saying my page is very slow, it takes 5.6 secs to load! Thats why i thought of tweeking it more!
     
    obscurant1st, Jul 26, 2011 IP
  8. no69_2007

    no69_2007 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #8
    wp cache plugin is useless, i believe this.

    Regards
     
    no69_2007, Jul 26, 2011 IP
  9. obscurant1st

    obscurant1st Active Member

    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #9
    i don't think its useless. Anyway now that you have said, I am disabling it and give it a try! :)
     
    obscurant1st, Jul 26, 2011 IP
  10. seosangrai

    seosangrai Active Member

    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #10
    91/100 is good enough. congrats!!
     
    seosangrai, Jul 26, 2011 IP
  11. revium

    revium Member

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    #11
    One thing you can try to do to help defer javascript is to implement an asynchronous version of any javascript you include. In order to do this, you usually need to modify the code slightly. You will have to check with each third party javascript to see if they offer an asynchronous version, and if they do then they will provide the code to do this.

    Asynchronous code allows a page to continue loading without waiting for the code to finish. So typically if you are loading a third party javascript you will have to wait until it loads entirely for a page to be listed as completely loaded, but with asynchronous code, once the initial request is sent to load the code the rest of the page continues loading and does not wait for it. This can help to speed up your page load time.

    If you are using Wordpress, also take a look at the number of plugins you are using. Do you really need the plugins on all of your pages? Plugins can definitely slow down the page speed in Wordpress.
     
    revium, Jul 26, 2011 IP