domain name legal advice

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by toby, Feb 23, 2006.

  1. #1
    Hello guys,

    I would like to know if "xp" inside the domain name considered Microsoft trademark violation? Actually, I would like to instead of using "eXPert" I use "XP". For example: instead of "flitexpert.com" I have "flirtxp.com"

    Is that a violation? With many thanks :)
     
    toby, Feb 23, 2006 IP
  2. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I suspect Microsoft have trademarked "Windows XP" rather than just XP.
     
    mad4, Feb 23, 2006 IP
  3. toby

    toby Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    269
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #3
    Mad4, thank you :) So does that mean it's okay to have site like "flirtxp.com" ?
     
    toby, Feb 23, 2006 IP
  4. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I would say so, yes. :)
     
    mad4, Feb 23, 2006 IP
  5. webguy75

    webguy75 Guest

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    flirtxp is fine......but it depends on the content. If you have Windows XP reviews, tips or start acting like a site that is afilliated with Microsoft, then you'll have issues. If you're an expert at flirting...then you're fine....just wink at the judge.
     
    webguy75, Feb 23, 2006 IP
  6. toby

    toby Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    269
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #6
    hhaha, ya wink at the judge yayyaya :D
     
    toby, Feb 24, 2006 IP
  7. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #7
    I'm not an attorney, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night :rolleyes:

    I don't think there is much to worry about. Most companies that protect their mark do so when they feel there might be some confusion. I don't see anyone confusing "flirtxp.com" with a outdated OS.
     
    Mia, Feb 24, 2006 IP
  8. edzachary

    edzachary Active Member

    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #8
    Not too sure if you could trademark just two letters. Didn't Hewlett Packard have this issue with someone...and lost? Seems to me that happened and the courts ruled against that.
     
    edzachary, Feb 25, 2006 IP
  9. toby

    toby Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,923
    Likes Received:
    269
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #9
    the last two comments are really encouraging :), thanks you guys!
     
    toby, Feb 25, 2006 IP
  10. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #10
    You don't need to file for a trademark to have legal rights to the name. Microsoft certainly has usage rights to XP - but they are not exclusive. Unless the domain name itself could confuse someone with being related to Microsoft, you probably wouldn't have any problems as long as the site wasn't related to Microsofts product or usuage. In short, they don't own the exclusive rights to xp, but you can ride the goodwill of another company.

    Common sense is usually a good guide. Did you choose the name because you wanted to captialize on a known trademark? If so, you can have problems. Any domain name with "apple" that sells computers or music is likely infringement. If you using the domain name to sell bird cages, and the domain name doesn't have computer or music in the domain name, then it probably isn't going to be a problem.
     
    mjewel, Feb 25, 2006 IP
  11. rewlie

    rewlie Active Member

    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #11
    I would like to pay a visit for your site :p
     
    rewlie, Feb 28, 2006 IP