Domain Dispute ICNN and WIPO

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by ifreakz, Feb 18, 2011.

  1. #1
    So, I received an email from WIPO and my registrar that a domain i own may be trademark property of some one else who actually owns the .com and demands the .net. I have not yet received a detailed report from WIPO.
    The owner has filed the dispute through WIPO
    I wish to know,
    What are the kind of aligations that can be brought, if i agree to give the domain to them?
    What are the WIPO fee structure like?
    What type of legal advisers can i consult, in India.

    Any help would be appreciated.
     
    ifreakz, Feb 18, 2011 IP
  2. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #2
    Well, the trademark holder can still pursue whatever "damages" (if any) are allowed under
    any applicable law. More often than not, though, they stop with the domain just given to
    them.

    WIPO's fees are in their web site wipo.int, though it doesn't cost the respondent anything
    if they choose to respond to the domain dispute on their own. Without knowing how it
    works, your chances of winning (again, if any) are essentially slim to none.

    You can consult any licensed lawyer or barrister with real-world experience in trademark
    law there. They're the only ones who can tell you after looking at any and all facts of
    your specific dispute, and beware of whoever might post here to tell you to just ignore
    that or tell them to screw off.
     
    Dave Zan, Feb 19, 2011 IP
  3. ifreakz

    ifreakz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #3
    To Start a dispute the opponent needs to pay around $1500.
    And to respond i need to pay around $300+

    Is it not so?
     
    ifreakz, Feb 19, 2011 IP
  4. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #4
    Only the complainant pays the $1500 or so fees to start the dispute. The respondent or
    domain holder, though, can opt to pay extra if s/he wants an additional panelist up to 3.

    For example, the complainant pays the fees and gets only one panelist. You don't have
    to pay any extra fees if you want to rebut the dispute yourself, and you can pay extra if
    you want to add another panelist (maximum of three per dispute) on top of the one that
    the complainant already got.

    If the complainant got all three panelists, not one more can be added to them. You can
    still dispute without paying any extra fees, other than maybe retaining a lawyer or so.

    Makes sense?
     
    Dave Zan, Feb 20, 2011 IP
  5. ifreakz

    ifreakz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #5
    ifreakz, Feb 20, 2011 IP
  6. Dave Zan

    Dave Zan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #6
    That's for the original "sunrise" period when .info domains were first offered to early folks
    who wanted to get them before being finally open to the public, and if someone wanted
    to dispute another's "rights" to it. Kinda funny it's still there since that's a decade ago.
     
    Dave Zan, Feb 21, 2011 IP