Do you think China would attack India in the near future

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by rexertea, Sep 16, 2009.

  1. Alevoor

    Alevoor Active Member

    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #21
    Come on, India is not Tibet .
    Tibet didn't have the concept of military, let alone have one.
    Agreed, they have encroached upon parts of AP and Ladhak but that was decades ago. They aren't moving out because of India's lack of will/guts to ask them to get out. But attacking India or trying to invade is different (Two big countries never fight each other anymore). May be they have breached the LAC/Mc Mohan Line or boundaries frequently, but did it give them courage to invade overtly ever?
     
    Alevoor, Sep 20, 2009 IP
  2. sachin410

    sachin410 Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    573
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    #22
    before the 62 war, India and China were considered almost equals in military strength.

    Nehru actually had an aggressive policy and asked the Indian army to reclaim the land that the Chinese had intruded into.

    Nehru assumed China would avoid a war and move back north of the McMahon Line.

    it proved to be a very silly assumption and led to a full fledged war.

    assuming China would like to avoid war is just repeating Nehru's dumb mistakes.

    had Nehru correctly anticipated China's intentions, India could have been much better prepared.

    ===================================

    In matters of its territorial claims, China doesn't even listen to super powers like US and Russia.

    how can anyone even expect it to listen to India?
     
    sachin410, Sep 20, 2009 IP
  3. gunners

    gunners Peon

    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    dude we got akshay kumar " Khatro Ke khiladi "
    he will woop there ass in a min.:mad:
     
    gunners, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  4. rexertea

    rexertea Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    101
    #24
    don't forget we also have Ajay devgan and our very own Sanju Bhaiya.
     
    rexertea, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  5. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #25
    I fail to understand what possible interest China could have with India. Seems doubtful they would do anything unless provoked.
     
    Mia, Sep 24, 2009 IP
  6. Alevoor

    Alevoor Active Member

    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #26
    @ sachin410
    Okay, let them try and attack now. If they were anywhere near being courageous to attack India like they did to Tibet, they would have done it by now. I have always said not to mix up the 1962 war and the Tibet invasion as they are different things that occurred at different situations against two different nations of differing capacities.

    Are you comparing India of 2009 to the Tibet of ~1950? I hope you know that the mighty America had lost a long drawn war against Vietnam despite being the Super Power that it is and extensively, heinously and audaciously using chemical arsenals? (Today the same US may not need to use a quarter of the might it used last time over and still be able to beat anyone rather cheaply)

    Read todays papers for Anil Kakodkar's and R. Chidambaram's statements endorsing the blast success and their grief over the falsified controversy which you are sucked into. And the myth of China's missile delivery capability is not verified/endorsed by international experts, for your information. (who knows why they won't turn duds and fall off mid way if they were to be fired at us?)

    Come on, wake up and get going about your day to day chores. We have some efficient people to man each mission critical operation. And the world knows it. Rest assured, China fears a lot about India too.
     
    Alevoor, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  7. Alevoor

    Alevoor Active Member

    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #27
    This is the point I have been stressing. There won't be a war between the two for as long as I can guesstimate.
     
    Alevoor, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  8. richierich1m

    richierich1m Peon

    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    Wars are done only by dumbs, its better to fight with economic or even better is that the entire world come together and destroy the boundaries itself. What a wonderful world that would be :) Might take a long time... :D
     
    richierich1m, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  9. sachin410

    sachin410 Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    573
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    #29
    I am not just comparing India of 2009 to Tibet of 1950, I am also comparing India of 2009 with India of 1962.

    The relative difference between military strengths of India and China is much more than it was in 1962.

    If China dared to attack India in 1962, it can in 2009 too.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5049297.cms

    India has landed up in such a situation because our idiotic leaders prefer to hope than to be prepared.

    If China decides to attack India, India will have no choice to meekly give away all the land that China wants.

    There is no question of India trying to using its nuclear arsenal against China.

    Santhanam has spoken up now because he is a true patriot and doesn't want Indian politicians to succumb to western pressure and sign NPT or any deal which prevents India from upgrading its defence systems.
     
    sachin410, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  10. rexertea

    rexertea Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    101
    #30
    What interest did Chinese had when they began playing games inside the Indian border at Arunachal Pradesh. Intrusions by the Chinese inside the Indian border at two places in the past one month says a lot about their interests. Frankly speaking, they would not like to attack India but people had conquered states just to get a piece of land. so anything is possible.
     
    rexertea, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  11. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #31
    No idea. I'd suggest asking China that question. :D
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  12. Alevoor

    Alevoor Active Member

    Messages:
    1,573
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #32
    @ Sachin
    It looks like your posts are motivated by your hidden interest to see both our countries going to war. For god knows what, you are arguing and justifying them with contradictory statements.

    Instance 1: Somewhere above you said
    and again, down here you say
    The first one is an utterly false justification by you. You should learn your history again. The build up to the 1962 war has seen India being invaded by China in Aksai Chin and to the utter consternation of the country, your favorite Nehru has stated in the parliament that:

    This being the case, there is no chance for Nehru asking the army to reclaim the lost land.

    India was stabbed in the back immediately following Hindi-Chini Bhai, Bhai agreement and the Pancha Sheela both of which provided India to have only a visiting police force, I repeat, a visiting police force (ITBP) that would visit the border only once in a week. Why was this intelligent, clever, fiercely patriotic Nehru not able to anticipate what followed next? Was he dumb? was he gagged by Chinese? Was he shy? Was he afraid? Or was he guilty of cheating the country?

    He had done it once before, so he knew how this coward country will react (rather not react). Please read, Filed Marshal, Cariappa's Autobiography. Cariappa had asked for 24 hours to reclaim all the lost ground from Pakistan to which Nehru replied that Cariappa could do it only on his dead body.

    It is not the leaders that are idiots in this country but we the people who either fall for war mongers or make baseless assumptions.

    Still, there is no need for you to make fictitious comparisons. If China is stronger by manifolds, why the hell would they want to break out into a war now? Foolish argument, that is.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2009
    Alevoor, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  13. sachin410

    sachin410 Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    6,422
    Likes Received:
    573
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    #33
    It looks like your posts are motivated by your hidden interest to keep India as weak and defenceless nation.

    If you knew about history (as you claim), you wouldn't find my statements contradictory.

    I stand by both my statements.

    the first statement refers to Nehru's forward policy.

    but he refused to increase military spending and prepare for a possible war.........dumb....isn't it?

    on one hand, Nehru wanted our troops to put pressure on the Chinese to move back and on other hand he didn't prepare for the war.

    he took for granted that China wouldn't risk a full-fledged war.

    source.

    we should learn from history and not repeat the same mistakes.
     
    sachin410, Sep 25, 2009 IP
  14. Stroh

    Stroh Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,482
    Likes Received:
    292
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #34
    Help control the people population have your kids spade or neutered :D

    I can't imagine hearing that. :eek:
     
    Stroh, Sep 25, 2009 IP