Is there any difference from experience? Are manual links more valuable than links built by software?
The best way to choose links building is manual. Few disagrees automatic link building by software. So, of course take by manual process.
Manual way is the only possible way for Google. Yet where can i find smart links partners? 99.9% of SEO sites have link farms or side-wide links. The manual link exchange is like the pure gold now. It is almost impossible to find such partners. Many webmasters prefer link farms, so, they are really newbies. I am tired of them and their silliness.
I don't have any site. I want to do link building for others for revenue only. Unfortunately I don't know how to do link building. Can you please coach/tell me how to do this link building? Thanks in advance.
I totally agree, Google became very picky lately and the best way is link exchange and the best way to do it is to guest posting.
I always built links manually never use any software ,because Google love the naturally links. and naturally links you can built by the manually way.
blog posting, forum posting etc are natural link building. in manually link building we get much advantage compare to automatic link building...
auto link building can only give you crap link, it wouldnt help much if you want to get good result, manual link building is compulsory
If I show you two links, can you think of a way that you could determine how the links had been created? I mean,seriously???
I have built quite a few sites. From my experience I can say that its just impossible to rank in the first page with only Automatically generated links. I liked the services provided by buildmyrank. You can try their free trial.
I have an experience of 5+ years in links building. If i would look at your two links, i surely will recognize the way they have been done. Yes, i can. )