DMOZ listing price list

You are the one claiming to be an ODP editall Julian. Why don't YOU do something about it?

 

Because those who try to do something about it, all of a sudden discover that they can not log in.
The corruption in DMOZ is organizational and it is not about this editor or that editor as I mentioned previously. Why do you think there is no willingness among Admins and Metas to stop corruption? Do you really think that they couldn't do that if they wanted to?
You still haven't answered if you are so powerful as you claim, why are you so afraid to tell us your editor name? What is it that we can find in your edit log? Or may be you are just afraid of your good friends in DMOZ?

 

If anyone wants to suggest URL to DMOZ, you must find a category with an editor. Otherwise, nobody will take care of your submit.

 

What? You say you are an editall which means you must of edited tens of thousands of sites. You have access to the entire directory, access to the tools that editalls have too weedout worthless sites but you do NOTHING becasue you are too scared. Either you are a boldface liar or a spineless coward. Which one is it Julian?

 

I am a practical man who knows how to be torn in the side of you and your friends. Only a fool will engage in a battle that is doomed to lose.

May be you should run along and add some of your affiliate links, sell some links to webmasters or add couple of pedophile sites as your contribution to "free speech" instead of wasting your time here trying to bullshit people with your defense of DMOZ since people are not stupid and will not buy it.

 

Seems you are sticking to the the editall story which not only makes a you a coward and a hypocrite of the first degree. All this wonking on about senior editors and you are one of them.

 

The difference is that I am not part of your gang and I don't sell links.

 

You have all the tools you need to expose this corruption you say exists, and you do nothing. That makes you a coward Julian. Some people like Qryztufre spoke out against what he perceived as wrongs when he was there. You are shaking in fear.

 

This would have hurt if you were someone that I respected but in scale of 1 to 10, my respect for you is -5, so I hope you won't mind if I just laugh at your opinion.

I have shown how corrupt DMOZ is, I have shown that DMOZ has no copyright, I have shown all pedophile sites and child porn sites that were listed in DMOZ and to a much bigger audience than is possible inside DMOZ; so I think is working very well. After all you are here trying desperately to defend DMOZ with your BS, aren't you?

 

Facts

1)You say that the ODP is full of corruption.
2)You say you are are an editor who can edit in all categories.
3)You say you dont want to anything about 1) by using editorial powers in 2)because you are afraid that they might remove your logon.

Shall we leave it to others to decide if the label "coward" fits?

 

Facts

1)I have shown you that the ODP is full of corruption.
2)You say you are are an editor who can do anything.
3)You dont want to anything about 1) by using editorial powers in 2)because you are afraid that they might remove your links and sold yourself.

Shall we leave it to others to decide if the label "hooker" fits?

Edit: after posting this, I came to conclusion that is wrong to call you a hooker since they are much more respectable than someone like you who misuse other people trust and defends corruption.

 

It is funny , I don't care if dmoz is corrupt or not corrupt it is google's duty to control it(I know they have no control I mean the control on its value).There will always be bad apples everywhere if they ruin all the box it is trown away.
But for dmoz Imo there are a lot of good ones still there and the bad apples will be cleaned.We are talking about humans of course there will be mistakes we can not expect a 0 failure system.

 

1)You are still harping on about some half baked conspiracy theory you came up with a year ago
2)I am not the one claiming corruption.
3) You have already admited that you are scared that they will remove your logon.

 

As I previously mentioned I would have cared about your opinion if I had any respect for you but I think most people already know who you are and what you defend so they can also understand that your opinion is worthless.

Since you are such a brave person in your own mind, how about you tell us your editor name? What are you afraid of, people start looking in your edit logs and find all kind of interesting links?

 

You can't weasel out this one Julian. YOU are one claiming corruption YOU are the one who says YOU can do something about it. YOU are the one who openly admits that you don't because YOU are too scared

 

I am doing something about it, only I am not stupid enough to do it the way you want me to, so admins can stop me.

Still no answer about how much garbage we can find in your edit logs that you are so afraid to post your editor name.

 

Of the several people that offered to get those sites listed how many were "good" editors and how many were "bad"? How many editors that OFFERED TO LIST the sites and how many flagged them "Do not list see bribe attempt at ….."

With all of the offers flying around, and with all of the people taking those offers up, are you seriously telling me that none of those 75,000 editors are corrupt? I'm willing to bet many sites get listed based on electronic transfers of funds.

I mean, according to the link in this thread the going rate is around $100 imagine how much a real estate site would pay. Most could likely pass up a site or two, but what of 10? what of 20? And with the few child molestation sites that have been listed, is a viagra site any less moral? Heh... to many I am sure they go hand in hand

 

Actually ODP and editors already admit to this but they call it SEO service. According to "senior" editors it is OK to add your client site if at the same time you approve couple of other sites that are submitted to the category.

 

Any Sr.DMOZ editor here in DP?

 

Why, looking to buy a link?