I don't think so, if you had feelings then you wouldn't defend pedophiles but I understand your anger with me for shinning the light on your friends. For those who are not familiar with nebuchadrezzar, you can look at his history of defending pedophile sites in this thread. This is just one example, look around and you can find more. It explains the type of person that he is much better than I can.
In that thread I called you a prime twit, which is what you are if you thought my posts were about defending pedophile sites.
Now after you have looked at previous thread and how he tried to excuse a pedophile site, You can look at this thread and how nebuchadrezzar defends multiple deep listings of the same adult site in DMOZ which has no content. Can it be that site may be belongs to one of his partners in DMOZ?
Thank you Julian. You have provided a perfect example of one of your vague nebulous claims of the absolute corruption of top level of the ODP. This is exactly what you do, you allude, you smear, you accuse, but when something of substance is required it all vaporizes. I stand by what I said in that thread especially the bit about talking to you is like talking to a brick wall.
It seems people after looking at those threads will get quite a good idea about who you are and I don't need to say anything, your posts here clearly shows who you are and what you defend. Now run back to DMOZ and RZ and play with the rest of scums there.
I do think the best answer is: your posts here clearly shows who you are and what you defend. Sorry But until DMOZ is cleaned up both inside and out, that IS who you defend when you speak in defense of the site that allows such things. I'm sorry, but such claims are confidential and are to not be shown to the public. If they are openly displayed then they will be tossed out the core rules of confidentiality. Once the powers that be can show substance, then substance will likely be given. Ask for an OPEN system and see just what kind of "brick walls" you have been talking too, and which kind of wall will come tumbling down. I once asked why there was not an appeals system for editors that got "let go" and I was called a TROLL even though I was civil and was asking a serious question...and I was called a troll by an Admin. Go find the proof yourself, it's in the internal forums. Once you find it, then look at how many changes I brought about, and just hope that when you are eventually fired for posting on Digital Point or listing a site you once visitied, then know that your case will remain private and your claims of innocence will be scoffed and laughed at behind the confidentiality rules set up to protect those in power. So until DMOZ can give proof, then really asking for proof is like the pot calling the kettle black.
Lets just for the moment go with this rotten to the core idea. Poor old Julian files an abuse complaint, nothing happens. Wouldn't this be the absolute best forum to expose it all. Hey Admin/Meta X owns all these crappy porn/ringtone/viagra sites. Here is the whois. They wouldn't stand a hope in hell of being listed if they were not in positions of power. They are ignoring my abuse complaints The abusive Admin/Meta would be royally screwed. That would be the end of it and I would be right behind dearest gworld.. Don't get me wrong, it isn’t perfect, meta editors have been removed for abuse more than once, but the truth kinda has a way of cutting through the crap. This truth does not seem to be feature in gworlds campaign I agree with you the system needs to be open. Get rid of all the secrecy. Edits logs should be made public just like wikipedia. Yes there should be better system for removing abusive editors. Reasons should be given. Shutting the door and giving them the silent treatment achieves nothing. I agree with all that. And I am not here to defend anything. Yes the ODP has lots of problems. They may or not be fixed. But there is a point where I am not going let the likes of gworld pump on with his hidden agenda. He does not believe in half the things he is saying, he has a score to settle. Yeah lets talk about the problems of the ODP, the real ones that is, not his delusional ones.
You try your best to defend pedophile sites, abuse by senior editors, multiple deep links to porn sites but you just fail because people are not stupid. Look at this response by Qryztufre to you after I posted your history in this forum: I told you people are not stupid.
OMG you are getting excited because someone is agreeing with you. That might happen more often if you abandoned the brick wall approach to these discussions.
Honestly it looks more like two walls talking to each other. "Hey, you're red and made of baked clay" "Shut up cuz you are held together with mortar!" If you are going to butt heads over which site is more morally up to par, then seemingly there is a LOT of cleaning to do. If it's going to be personal attacks then I look forward to the "yo mama" part of the argument because those can get really funny. Though both do little to nothing to further the cause of either side. In fact, it just makes it harder on the rest of us trying to maintain a level of dignity or decent reputation. And I'm not just referring to you nebuchadrezzar, I'm speaking in general. The name calling and personal attacks are simply ridiculous. And the site bashing is just outright funny...especially when it is coming from DMOZ as I showed in a previous post. ___________________ I would like to point out that in one of these threads about paying to get in I made an off handed comment that I could make it happen. I've received SEVERAL private messages asking about it & how much I'd charge. I replied to most of them with a link to the submission guidelines and my paypal address
It is not the first time that people agree with me. Anyone can read that thread to see how everyone else in this forum nailed your pedophile supporting ass to the wall.
Hells bells Julian. Now you are saying I support pedophiles. Is there some level to which you will not stoop? You are pathetic.
I complained about DMOZ listing a site that advocates sex with children as clearly could be seen from the quote from that site: Your response to my and minstrel outrage was: I think it is enough said about what you support, isn't it?
Every time you touch your keyboard you make yourself look more stupid Julian. The book burning quip was explicitly a direct reference to this statement and nothing else. You are demonstrating clearly and unequivocally how you distort things to fit your world view. This includes the conspiracy theories. Every time you post this sort of drivel your credibility erodes even further.
Where did I mention the book? My criticism was about a site that was advertised by DMOZ and clearly was advocating pedophilia and rape of children. You had to post in that thread to defend DMOZ practice of listing such sites. Do you really believe you are fooling anybody with your speech about freedom of speech and democracy for pedophiles? Even the other scums in DMOZ finally had to give up the stupid free speech defense for pedophiles or have you forgotten the discussions in the internal forum?