Distrubution of Pageranks for the entire internet!!!

Discussion in 'Google' started by whiteblue1942, Mar 2, 2008.

0
  1. #1
    found this thought it was interesting just thought id share.....:)

    0.00000138% pr10
    0.00000827% pr9
    0.00004961% pr8
    0.00029769% pr7
    0.00178612% pr6
    0.01071674% pr5
    0.06430041% pr4
    0.38580247% pr3
    2.31481482% pr2
    13.88888893% pr1
    83.33333356% pr0
     
    whiteblue1942, Mar 2, 2008 IP
  2. hasan_889

    hasan_889 Banned

    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    can you mention the source ... i would be interested to read the whole article. Thanks anyway!
     
    hasan_889, Mar 2, 2008 IP
  3. mickmel

    mickmel Peon

    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I've always felt that it would around a factor of 6 to go from one level to the next, which that chart shows exactly.

    That makes me think someone said "Ok, if it really is a factor of six, what would that look like?" and then built the chart.

    As hasan_889 said, source?
     
    mickmel, Mar 2, 2008 IP
  4. Steve McQueen

    Steve McQueen Peon

    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Nice information. Thanks!
     
    Steve McQueen, Mar 2, 2008 IP
  5. Adam Hughes

    Adam Hughes Guest

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    What is the Pr thing all about? I've noticed that a few times n thought "what the....?!" what is each 'rank' equivelent to? A heads up would be nice! I feel a bit left out of the PR social group...haha
     
    Adam Hughes, Mar 2, 2008 IP
  6. angilina

    angilina Notable Member

    Messages:
    7,824
    Likes Received:
    186
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #6
    This Distrubution looks so correct:)
     
    angilina, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  7. The Stealthy One

    The Stealthy One Well-Known Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #7
    Thank you very much for sharing that! :)
     
    The Stealthy One, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  8. MikePrice

    MikePrice Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    860
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #8
    Are you the sure or only your opinion?
     
    MikePrice, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  9. MathArt

    MathArt Peon

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Cool! now we can work backwards to find the total number of pages Google has indexed. And from there, you can work even more backwards and find your own PageRank.

    :D
     
    MathArt, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  10. jtpratt

    jtpratt Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    123
    #10
    yea, I think everyone here would like to know the source of your data. Did you estimate this yourself somehow, or find these stats published somewhere?
     
    jtpratt, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  11. mickmel

    mickmel Peon

    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    This must be an estimate that someone created, as it is precisely a factor of six.

    Even if PR is based on a factor of six, which I think it might, you'd begin to see at least a little variance toward the top.
     
    mickmel, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  12. fr@nc!z

    fr@nc!z Active Member

    Messages:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #12
    Where did you get this info? I want to know more about it....
     
    fr@nc!z, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  13. Nystul

    Nystul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,077
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #13
    yah, everyone wants to know the source, or how this is derived.
     
    Nystul, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  14. mickmel

    mickmel Peon

    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I've mentioned twice in this thread how it was derived, but we still don't know the source.
     
    mickmel, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  15. myclip

    myclip Peon

    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    i am not sure as so new to this and never mind if you can share a full details or an article about this
     
    myclip, Mar 6, 2008 IP
  16. sray

    sray Active Member

    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #16


    Can you share the source please. It would be more interesting reading the article. :)
     
    sray, Mar 7, 2008 IP
  17. Avtar9

    Avtar9 Banned

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    interesting information, i too would like the source of this information,
    thank you?
     
    Avtar9, Mar 7, 2008 IP