Directory owners, does submitted site's design matter?

Discussion in 'Directories' started by alistair80, Aug 31, 2009.

  1. #1
    Fellow Directory owners,

    I would like to know whether or not you take submitted websites' design and looks too into consideration during approval. For instance, a site could be informative but lack in proper navigation structure, could have an empty internal page, a broken link or an image that doesnt show...

    Would you approve such a site in your directory if it adheres to all your directory guidelines?

    Feel free to share your opinion.

    Thanks
     
    alistair80, Aug 31, 2009 IP
  2. stoner3221

    stoner3221 Notable Member

    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    233
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #2
    Editorial guidelines are just as stated guidelines. The editor has to review the website as a whole. As an editor these are my three major qualifiers for submissions that have passed our minimum submission standards:
    Professional looking
    Informative
    A useful internet resource
     
    stoner3221, Aug 31, 2009 IP
  3. fastreplies

    fastreplies Banned

    Messages:
    2,336
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #3
    Unfinished sites???
    Editors call them "Under Contraction" and send them back

    Design doesn't matter but if site is missing:
    About Us, Privacy, Terms of Service, Sitemap etc. whatever makes just another mushroom farm directory
    look like real Web Site, then you're out

    ;)

    fastreplies
     
    fastreplies, Aug 31, 2009 IP
  4. stoner3221

    stoner3221 Notable Member

    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    233
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #4
    Don’t you mean Under Construction? Not "Under Contraction";)
     
    stoner3221, Aug 31, 2009 IP
  5. xc06

    xc06 Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    332
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    203
    #5
    the content is more important, however the design should not be too bad.
     
    xc06, Aug 31, 2009 IP
  6. pipes

    pipes Prominent Member

    Messages:
    12,766
    Likes Received:
    958
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #6
    Depends what type of site it is, if theres a few problems on the site thats fine, if the site is a complete mess with some things missing then thats different.
     
    pipes, Sep 1, 2009 IP
  7. YMC

    YMC Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,787
    Likes Received:
    404
    Best Answers:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #7
    To some extent website design is like art, it's personal. I also take into account that not everyone is or can afford a pro web designer.

    My primary focus in reviewing sites is whether or not they share information that I would consider worthwhile or at least make a half-decent attempt at selling their product or service. With businesses, I ask myself would I ever consider buying from them based upon their site's presentation. Again, quite subjective.

    If the site isn't quite done and I think it has merit, I'll leave it in the queue and change the description to include - not finished as of <date>. If I check a few weeks later and it's the same, I usually dump it.

    I've been known to let a website owner know when I've found a broken link or other boo boo in their acceptance letter and won't let that sort of thing disqualify them. (Granted, running niche directories involves a much smaller number of sites to review each day.)

    If however, the site is virtually impossible to navigate or spawns a multitude of pop-ups, it's gone.
     
    YMC, Sep 1, 2009 IP
    pipes likes this.
  8. Obelia

    Obelia Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    171
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    210
    #8
    Since my broken links and under construction pages are against my guidelines, then probably not. In practice though it's always a matter of degree: one or two misspelled links amongst a rich and useful resource is not a big problem.
     
    Obelia, Sep 1, 2009 IP
  9. alistair80

    alistair80 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    59
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #9
    Totally agree! The look of a Web site IS important because it shapes the first impression of the visitor And this is something I don't understand when it comes to DMOZ cuz many sites listed there are poorly designed. I like DMOZ very much. It's just strange why its stringent editors do not take the design factor in consideration.
     
    alistair80, Sep 1, 2009 IP
  10. syted

    syted Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,086
    Likes Received:
    319
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #10
    Well it's always going to be an editorial decision which is why human editing is the only way to run a directory. I like aesthetically pleasing sites for first impression, BUT it's the content that counts. Say you had a 'cashless society' category, would you accept this site? This guy actually lives cashless and updates his blog at internet cafes, he can't pay a designer and makes it even worse by using all the wrong fonts, colours etc. It looks a mess, but I wouldn't think twice about listing it.
     
    syted, Sep 1, 2009 IP
  11. alistair80

    alistair80 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    59
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #11
    I just checked the site and its awesome. I'd not think twice about listing it either...The good thing about the site is that aside from the content, the page actually "loads". All the images show properly. If the same site with same information had little red xs instead of the images, then I'd have to think twice before adding it. Therefore, considering whether not a site is "complete" AND informative is perhaps more important than the quality of its design(?)
     
    alistair80, Sep 1, 2009 IP