Your argument is even more ridiculous when you look at it from a directory point-of-view.. You know your in a directory owners forum right? Your argument is anyone that rejects ANY submissions is wrong... Lance
I agree... and like I said I would have to see the content. I am listening to some bootleg Jerry on the Banjo tapes right now..
Mister Charlie after looking through your recent posts I have to say you are the biggest hypocrite on DP...Didn't you say this in the Aviva QBC thread? Wow.... well aren't you just the self imposed censor of free speech...
Hello... An editor/directory owner should be identical to a trial judge in many ways that both sides off the coin where tossed and he made a unbiased decision after reviewing all the different information he gathered before he/she makes their ultimate decison. At least thats what i do before im stuck ... thx malcolm
Exactly, there are lots of factors that must come into play before deciding on what gets accepted. And none have to do with morality. Although Mister Charlie will probably look at your assessment in a vacuum and call you a member of the SS for assuming you have such power... Good points Malcolm Lance
Thanks guys and girls for your opinions and thoughts, i very much appreciate it, very helpful for me. thanks pipes
I wouldn't care bout a psychedelics site. As long as it's the real deal and not one of those fake drug sites that people mass produce it would be ok