Did you see Robots.txt on Webmaster Word?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by skionxb, Sep 13, 2006.

  1. #1
    http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots.txt

    check this link out guys, what do you think? Do you think Brett wants his links and the text spidered more often by SE crawlers? Because robots.txt tends to be the most visited file?

    I THINK IT IS ANOTHER TYPE OF LINK BAITING STRATEGY

    Any thoughts?
     
    skionxb, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  2. nicknick

    nicknick Peon

    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    That's an interesting idea.
     
    nicknick, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  3. starke

    starke Active Member

    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #3
    Although, it looks like he disallow's all? Don't get that?
     
    starke, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  4. nicknick

    nicknick Peon

    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    that is strange. Maybe they're trying to see which robots will index the text in the robots file alone.
     
    nicknick, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  5. activeimedia

    activeimedia Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #5
    Yeah I dont understand.
     
    activeimedia, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  6. nevetS

    nevetS Evolving Dragon

    Messages:
    2,544
    Likes Received:
    211
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #6
    It's dynamically generated - makes you wonder if he's actually serving the same thing to googlebot et all. It wouldn't surprise me, as he's disallowed all spiders there before - but I've seen plenty of talk about serving up
    User Agent: *
    Disallow: /
    to individual spiders.

    It does have a vary/user agent line in the response headers, as well as a no-cache pragma.
     
    nevetS, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  7. everypcneed

    everypcneed Peon

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Interesting...the robots.txt file has a PR of 4 and the main page a PR of 7.

    Very interesting

    Rick
     
    everypcneed, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  8. m0rtal

    m0rtal Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,548
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #8
    The ownered banned the search engines to stop them from sucking bandwidth apparently, old news:

    searchenginejournal.com/?p=2546
     
    m0rtal, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  9. shivam

    shivam Peon

    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    why that much writing in robots.txt. Mostly SEO Suggest that don't add any extra and this site...????
     
    shivam, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  10. m0rtal

    m0rtal Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,548
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #10
    Who cares what's in there? He does not want any search engine robots visiting the site anyways. And read the end of the file. IT"S A BLOG.
     
    m0rtal, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  11. seo-mumbai

    seo-mumbai Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,004
    Likes Received:
    183
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #11
    that is really great find, i will do some research in this, i think he tryed some thing else and showing diff, we all know they are good at seo, so we need to test once.
     
    seo-mumbai, Sep 14, 2006 IP
  12. illusion

    illusion Peon

    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    # As I was messing with the robots.txt for the 1000th time over the last week,
    # I had a conversation with myself, that went something like this:
    #
    # me: Self, can you publish a blog in a robots.txt file?
    # self: Sure you can. Robots would just ignore the commented lines.
    #
    # me: What would be the point?
    # self: Fun and merriment. Who knows, you could find world peace in here.
    #
    # me: Would people still read it?
    # self: Probably. If they will read blogger - they'll read anything ;-)
    #
    # me: Any downside? Any problems with a regularly updated robots.txt?
    # self: This is another fine SEO test you've gotten us into.
    #
    # me: But don't you need to enable comments?
    # self: Posting an article and then taking comments? Hey Dufus, it is called
    # a FORUM - and everyone knows we already have one of those!
    #
    # me: I love the idea. It has a cool retro BBS feel to it. I almost want to
    # break out my trusty old 64, fire up a copy of Cnet BBS, and start posting
    # some zeroday warez dude. lol!
    # self: I'm going to try it for awhile. Seems like fun for a change.
    #
    # The rest is left as an excersize to the reader.
    #
    # - bt

    Interesting :p
     
    illusion, Sep 14, 2006 IP
  13. cormac

    cormac Peon

    Messages:
    3,662
    Likes Received:
    222
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Exactly and its one of the reasons why he is getting good page rank for the file, everyone started linking back to the file when he banned all the search engines.
     
    cormac, Sep 14, 2006 IP
  14. seo-mumbai

    seo-mumbai Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,004
    Likes Received:
    183
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #14
    yo so u feel this is this reverse trick to get backlinks and gain pr.we say say this as negetative publicity.
     
    seo-mumbai, Sep 14, 2006 IP
  15. cormac

    cormac Peon

    Messages:
    3,662
    Likes Received:
    222
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Nope as m0rtal said he banned the search engines as they were sucking up too much bandwidth and everyone was surprised at his decision.

    His post on the decision is here and Danny Sullivan described it as a nuclear bomb.

    Webmasterworld doesnt need to pull a trick to gain anymore exposure just like Digital point doesnt need too and to be honest it would be a very stupid trick to pull just to gain backlinks - PR means nothing in this case.
     
    cormac, Sep 14, 2006 IP