http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Bundy What is it in Republican party that attracts the worst of the worst? Some like Ted Bundy become serial killers in national stage and other will do the same in the world stage.
You're obviously an unhappy little fella Julian, but it constantly surprises me the odd ways you choose to share that unhappiness with others. This is (yet another) purposeless thread. There are two primary political parties in the US, and every mass murderer, psychopath and whacko can be associated with one or the other, so statistically about half might be Republicans, though if I'm a betting man it's lopsided the other direction. Either way, all this thread proves is that if intellect inferred height, you'd have to stand on a brick to kiss a ducks ass.
This does not mean that since he is a Republican, you can generalize that Republicans are worst of the worst. It so happen that you are on the opposite party. I have highlighted in a quote the good traits Bundy had which has given him the chance to manage a presidential campaign. His being a serial killer doesn't connect to being a Republican. Maybe he changes party and become a serial killer.
Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower...................................................... to Ron Paul. Republicans have their fair share of best of the best.
Bush and his lot killed a lot more people than Ted. He was lame compared to today's Republicans. I hope they meet the same fate, as should anyone who kills more people than they've had breakfasts.
Not apples and oranges because they're both the same size. More like a mini minor & a road train, Ted being the mini. If you can consider the horror those girls went through, times it by a thousand at least because that's how many innocent CHILDREN alone they killed.
You're right, the Republican deaths are probably more like the qe2 compared to a mini, what was I thinking? More importantly, what would the parents of those poor dead kids be thinking when noone is being punished, indeed the perpetrators consider themselves heroes and noone is arguing against that? That's outrageous.
IF we are going by body count, FDR has them both beat(combined), and Truman has FDR beat. Both were democrats. If we are talking about most American's killed, President Abraham Lincoln wins hands down (Republican who freed the slaves). Anyway, comparing wartime leaders with serial killers is absurd, even if you are talking about an unpopular war like Vietnam (Kennedy and LBJ who were both Democrats). By that logic, any cop who has used his weapon in the line of duty is a murderer. Most 8 year-olds have a better grasp of ethics. Now getting back to GWorld's original troll, a more legitimate comparison to Bundy would be Jim Jones, a powerful San Francisco Democrat who rubbed elbows with the likes of Moscone, Willie Brown, and current California Governor Gerry "Moonbeam" Brown(no relation to Willie). Jim Jones, Democrat, personally oversaw the murder of 913 men, women, and children who bought into his socialist/communist dream.