Did U.S.A land on the moon?

that's simple - it's on the dark side of the moon

 

Exactly! That's where Pink Floyd lives!

 

In my best backgorund voice.

"There is no dark side of the moon. As a matter of fact, it's all dark."

I found proof that we didn't go to the moon. I know it's true because it's on the internet. http://www.orwelltoday.com/moonhoaxdoc.shtml

 

Somehow I knew it'll all be Nixon's fault. Or Pat Robertson. It's always one or the other.

 

I wonder if AnthonyCEA wrote that Nixon stuff!

 

Probably not. Only 8 references to Nixon and no google searches to back up the claims

 

Did Russia ever land on the moon with astronauts? If so fox tv is not telling the truth. But if they didn't, US can also send mirrors without astronauts. So this doesn't prove anything. And stop insulting people for not beleiving what you beleive. If all these mistakes are coincidences then there are too many mistakes to make it perfect like they did.

 

LOL. Dude, I bet you consider yourself a super intellectual because you don't believe the moon landing took place, don't you? Which makes this twice as funny.

 

That's a logically sound argument right there.

 

Russians did not land on the moon. However, people who do not believe the U.S. are ignoring the facts and evidence. This isn't a matter of belief. SCIENCE IS NOT ABOUT BELIEF IT IS ABOUT FACTS AND EVIDENCE.

If the U.S. did not land on the moon, why didn't the Soviets expose this fact? They had all of the technical means necessary AND a vested interest to expose any fraud or hoax in regards to the moon landings. The U.S. beating the U.S.S.R. to the moon was a major defeat for the Soviets in the space race.

People need to remember that the space race wasn't just about national prestige. It was a major part of the Cold War AND the drive to prove the superiority of Communism over Capitalism or vise versa. The Cold War and the Space Race were nothing short of a full out fight for the direction all of civilization would take and which country all the other countries would fall in line behind.

If the Soviets had exposed the moon landings as a fraud it would have been a massive embarrassment for the U.S. AND a major political coup for the Soviets. Again the Soviets had every incentive to expose any fraud in regards to moon landing AND they had the technical means to expose such a fraud. Yet the Soviets accepted the moon landings as fact and NEVER raised any questions about the moon landings.

Unless someone can provide evidence why the Soviets would have been complicit with any NASA hoax in regards to the moon landings then all other arguments that the moon landings did not happen fall apart and are invalidated.

 

That's because the Russians didn't have parad0x to lend them his superior investigative abilities, i.e. he gotsta Innernet.

 

stop means stop!!!!

 

We beat the Soviets to it I think we did. Anyways if we didnt China is planning on being on the moon within the decade I believe.

 

Wow....I think we need a conspiracy board along with P & R....dude, what are you on?

 

LOL. I laughed my butt off when the Chinese were going ballistic about sending a guy into outer space for what, a few minutes? I was like, "Dude, didn't we do that, like, 40 years ago???" LMAO.

 

Remember europe celebrating when it launched a GPS satellite? Its like (what?) 20 years too late and its less accurate than ours? Heh.

 

For those who might want to believe the U.S. bought the Soviet complicity in our moon landing "hoax" here are more sources that are must reads for those who do not accept the FACT that we landed on the moon:

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html (a really good point by point debunking of the Fox special)

http://www.apollo-hoax.me.uk/strangeshadows.html (divergent shadows, this page shows you how to take pictures with divergent shadows using only the sun as a light source)

http://www.iangoddard.net/moon01.htm (more on shadows and photo "anomalies)

http://www.clavius.org/ (do not come back to this thread and argue that NASA did not land on the moon until you have read this entire site and can refute it argument by argument with footnotes and citations)

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0007467E-C454-1E1C-8B3B809EC588EEDF&catID=2

http://www.unmuseum.org/moonhoax.htm (its a lot easier to go to the moon than to stage a hoax and then keep 1,000s of people involved in the conspiracy from spilling the beans)

http://www.sptimes.com/2002/09/29/Floridian/Lunar_lunacy.shtml

Like other discussions. This issue isn't a debate. A debate is where two sides have facts and evidence to support their ideas. This is an issue where one group wants to believe something (that the moon landings are a hoax) in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. This is nothing short of another instance where science and reason must prevail over disinformation, flawed logic and laughable "theories" (the moon landing hoax myth really doesn't deserve the term theory). It is well past time for a learned society stop giving credence to conspiracy myths like they moon landing hoax myth and that we stop giving any credence to those who try to perpetuate said myths. Science and reason MUST prevail.

 

OK I think this interview with Buzz Aldrin should answer everyone's questions

http://youtube.com/watch?v=KrTlpJMJR_A

 

What the....

Why the heck did he ever do that interview. That was just twisted.

Oh and yes folks the moon does exist, but you can't stay there because it is full.

 

I'm reading that Clavius site I mentioned earlier and http://www.clavius.org/scale.html is a great page showing why a conspiracy in and of itself would be impossible and if not impossible, much harder than actually going to the moon. Put simply it would have been way more complicated to pretend to go to the moon and keep the truth hidden than it would be to actually go to the moon. You try to keep a conspiracy involving a half million people secret for 30 years.