Dems say "no more Global War on Terror"

LOL. Are we talking about Gtech, the leader of missing balls chicken brigade? I know he is your special big daddy but you over estimate his military experience which was mainly peeling potatoes, polishing boots and giving out pamphlets in front of high schools.

 

I would imagine al qaida officers spend a great deal of time picking out drapes and curtains for those caves in Afghanistan.

 

There he goes again, always fascinated with little boys and special "father/son" relationships.

 

Taking another look at the title of this thread 'Dems say "no more Global War on Terror"', it occurs to me that if it weren't for the Democrats, there really would be no more War on Terror.

If there were no Democrats, the Jihadis would realize that screwing with us would never achieve their desired goals and they would simply stop.

 

It will be very interesting to know, how people like little willy will stop them while hiding under the bed?

 

He and the rest will wave their medicals at them, along with their tiny american flags, and if it gets really rough they will pull out the yellow ribbons.

 

where as the dems will have a "peace march" in Washington DC with banners that say "We give up", and "we are sorry" and "allah akbar!".

 

We are talking about "brave" Republicans like you, mia and little willy will do beside crying about that you are suffering from severe missing balls syndrome and you can't fight because of your "medical" condition.

 

thats better than having no reason at all....what is your excuse and your "little boy (uugghh...)" ferret's excuse?

The fact that I can't serve tells me I should support the troops even more, again what is your excuse?

 

I don't think d16boy and little willy dare to wear this. Some one can mistake them for a man and ask them to fight.

 

I am glad that you and your friends are finally admitting to the truth about the fact that you are finding excuses to justify being a coward and you are just a loud mouth sissy cheerleader.

 

great...now answer my questions...what are your excuses for A) not serving and B) for not supporting?

 

I am not a doctor, but I know that doctors do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not a nuclear physicist, but I know that nuclear physicists do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not a police officer, but I know that police officers do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not a farmer, but I know that farmers do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not a garbage collector, but I know that garbage collectors do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not an accountant, but I know that accountants do an important job and I respect them for doing it.
I am not a soldiers, but I know that soldiers do an important job and I respect them for doing it.

Your "argument" is prima facie moronic. We live in an age of specialization -- and we have done so for several hundred years. Have you even heard of The Wealth of Nations?

I chose not to go into the military. Another fellow chose to go into the military. That's freedom -- that's the kind of freedom that America represents.

Now, quit sucking each others cocks and get back to work at trying to come up with one decent rational argument.

 

very nice...now if they would only answer my questions....notice how they both have lots of pictures of "boys" in uniform...makes me wonder what they are really searching google for...

 

We know that you are none of the above but we also know that you are a loser that it is too much of a coward to actually fight while cheering for war and sending others to death.

 

It doesn't seem like you know anything but hate.

Did your mommy not love you enough as a child?

 

I don't deny that I hate assholes who are just big mouth sissy cheerleader for war.

 

Most of us were admiring the fact that you cheer terrorists, but are too lazy to go over and fight with them to earn your own virgins. Instead, you sit on DP spewing their propaganda for them, thinking that will be enough to get a few girls (or, should we say, little boys?).