1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Dems say "no more Global War on Terror"

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by d16man, Apr 4, 2007.

  1. #1
    It seems the dems think the term "Global War on Terror" is misleading and inappropriate to use...from now on they want to ban this phrase and replace it with "War in Iraq", or "operations around the world".....seriously, is this why these people were elected? To ban phrases that they call "misleading"? What a crock.

    http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2007/04/military_gwot_democrats_070403w/
     
    d16man, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  2. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #2
    Democrats support terror. It comes as no surprise that they would want to modify the phrase to make it more PC.
     
    Mia, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  3. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #3
    I love how they say that it is a misleading phrase...as if "redeployment" was not misleading...
     
    d16man, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  4. Josh Inno

    Josh Inno Guest

    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    It is misleading. War can be waged on a specific organization, not on an emotion, or on a broad generalized collection of organizations that is defined at whim.
     
    Josh Inno, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  5. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #5
    are you brainwashed or something? seriously. You actually believe one of the two major partyes in your country "support terror"? you actually believe they want to kill all americans?
     
    iul, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  6. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #6
    No and Yes. Hope that answers your questions. Do you require further clarification?
     
    Mia, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  7. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #7
    so you're saying you truly believe an american party that's voted by millions of people actualy wants to destroy USA? why don't they start a civil war or something? considering they are supported by a lot of people surely a civil war wouldn't be too hard for them to start
     
    iul, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  8. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #8
    I wonder how many people will die as a result of banning these terms. :confused:
     
    Crazy_Rob, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  9. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #9
    I have no doubt that most of the moonbat followers of the Democratic party really believe that they are well meaning in their intentions.. However, there is a small majority of them that have one goal. To appease everyone if it helps in their own agenda.

    So either willingly, knowingly or unwillingly and unknowingly, yes, Democrats appear to be hell bent on the destruction of the very fabric of America.

    To help you understand why it appears this way to me, here are some examples of Democrat ideals:

    1. Kill babies
    2. Give aid and comfort to terrorists
    3. Tax people who work and give that money to people who do not
    4. Blame everyone and accept no personal responsibility for anything
    5. God is bad
    6. We know what's best for you, you don't

    Should I go on?
     
    Mia, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  10. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #10
    1. Kill retards and brave soldiers
    2. Give aid and comfort to criminals
    3. Tax everyone but the wealthly
    4. Blame everyone and accept no personal responsibility for anything
    5. God is EVERYTHING
    6. We know what's best for you, you don't - TRUST US
     
    Crazy_Rob, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  11. iul

    iul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,263
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #11
    1. by killing babyes I suppose you mean abortion. Isn't abortion already leggal in many other countrys who are not led by "democrats"?
    2. what do you mean by aid and confot to terrorists?
    3. it's called social aid I think. There are cases of people who really can't work to support themselfs. A good example would be people with severe handicap. What do you suggest doing about those people ? kill them because they were unfortunate enough to have a handicap?
    4. what do you mean by that? if a person kills another person no one will be held responsable for the killing?
    5. you think all democrats are atheists? so, even if they are what makes you think YOU are right when it comes to religion and not them? After all, religion has caused us humans to fight a lot of wars that wouldn't have been fought otherwise
    5. what do you mean by this?
     
    iul, Apr 4, 2007 IP
    Crazy_Rob likes this.
  12. Pixelrage

    Pixelrage Peon

    Messages:
    5,083
    Likes Received:
    128
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  13. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #13
    Why not replace the term with "Total Fabricated Hoax?"
     
    AGS, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  14. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I think it should be renamed to "War on Muslim fanatics" that is the current war going on, the name is correct;)
     
    Toopac, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  15. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #15
    these are all made up phrases used by republicans to twist the truth and fool people like you. it is very appropiate that democrats are going to use the correct terminology to describe things.
     
    pizzaman, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  16. jackburton2006

    jackburton2006 Peon

    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    282
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    jackburton2006, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  17. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #17
    so would using the term "redeployment" be better and less misleading than "withdraw and surrender"? Thats what Nancy is trying to push...
     
    d16man, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  18. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #18
    i think we should bring rumsfeld back to finish the job:rolleyes:
     
    pizzaman, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  19. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #19
    thats great, but you avoided my question...
     
    d16man, Apr 4, 2007 IP
  20. Josh Inno

    Josh Inno Guest

    Messages:
    1,623
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Josh Inno, Apr 4, 2007 IP