Edz, I agree. I'm not trying to get around. I was the one who went back and requoted it when you attempted to use it to suggest I called all democrats traitors. Honestly, I don't know where you get that from the quote. In fact I was not aware of that. Which is exactly why I had to resort to using huge bold type. I could not see how you could not get that my comment did not refere to all democrats as traitors. And I still cannot. It does not say this in the least bit, and I'm having a heck of time trying to figure out how you could possibly twist it into saying such. Indeed. [If] (remember, I've noted this is alleged, a charge and even further that it seems to have little traction, if any) members of the democrat party met secretly with known ememies of our country, then it would be different. If they had Presidential or Congressional approval to do such, that's one case (legal oversight and representing our country officially), however, if they did it secretely, on their own, and not as official representatives of our country, then IT IS a different story. It needs to be exposed and questions need to be asked and answered about why they held such an unofficial meeting. That is your difference. Further, you said: This is not true. You have failed to address this charge, time and again. I have not said this anywhere, and I consider it an outright lie. Again, I ask you to stand behind your comment and point out where I said this, or be a man and retract it. Put your personal hatred of me aside for a moment and do what is right. I chose my words very carefully and I've put great effort into avoiding any misperceptions like you've alleged. However, I have no control over other's deceit and willingness to rewrite what I have said. I submit that my words were chosen carefully, but that you have twisted them so far out of what they were, as to resort to actually making things up that I said. Be a man and correct your statement. I did not say it and you've based a good portion of your needless argument based upon that. You'll need to point out and quote what classification you are referring to. At this point, you've made up so much about what I didn't say, that unless you are willing to directly quote my words (and not rewrite them entirely, as you have been), I have no comment.
Thank you for pointing that out McFox. Gtech already conveyed his message of treason very well and to which i responded and then the follow up you pointed out in combination with the below quote: It's what people will conclude from his wordings. And then statements like this should not be a surprise: But Gtech is fleeing from his responsibility that he holds when he is making statements about certain events and even want us to believe that it's not what he said by the wordings he has used. And i am sure not going to retreact anything Gtech, why would i retract something i said that is only natural to conclude from your wordings? As i said before if this is not what you meant to convey then you need to practice on your communication skills. I wasn't alone to conclude from your wordings that you regard the Democrats as traitors IF they would have held such a meeting you referred to. And for the record i did NOT rewrite anything, everything i put forward are direct quotes from your posts. Secondly i do NOT have hatred for you, just one more lie you put forward. It's pure fun for me to tell it like it is, even more with some pictures Have a very nice day.
Cause they disagree with G-Tit so they must be "antiamerican" Therefore talking to them is traitorous.
No, but you are not far off. These are two separate issues. I take no exception about kerry being a traitor. I've documented that before and I stand behind it. What Edz did was just an outright lie. He asserted: This is a lie on his part. It is deceitful and untrue. And rather than retract and/or correct the statement, it chooses to mask it in more lie and deceit. I'm flattered he has to lie. Lying is a sign of weakness (as well as a lack of home training)
when are you guys going realize what a joke gtech is, hiding out in rural texas hating and fearing everyone different then him
Yeah GTech looks to be getting a bit of a run for his money in this thread. @ Mr M I too had him on ignore but I just had to take him off ignore because I couldn't take not being able to see his crazy ramblings any longer.
Hey, anyone can lie and garner support from people who have a history of doing so. Nothing special about that
Another stalker. Would you like my address too? It seems most of you posts here have been directed at me in some form or another. If you like men, ferret's your guy
Perhaps it's the proximity of the 'Kerry traitor' sentence closely followed by the 'whether democrats actually met secretly with terrorist enemies of our country'? Kinda gives the distinct impression you mean the democrats are traitors, as per your definition of what makes Kerry a 'traitor', no?