EarlPearl, you're rambling. Please note that I pointed it out as a "charge, " and "allegation." That would be one of the differences between myself and some of the very people in this thread when it comes to things like this. Had it been republicans, they would have been tried and convicted by some of the very same people in this thread. But really, beside the point, at least try to address some of my previous response. After reading your last response, there's no direction to it. It's just rambling on and on and on about things that are not even part of the topic. mcfox, oh yes, you were suckered hardcore! You fell for it, tried to defend it, and got owned. But apparently you didn't learn your lesson Here are your wmd. Edz - Man, are you on acid? Not even sure how to respond to your dufus post! It's clear you don't read before responding. I'll give you a pass on this one. My guess is, you were having some sort of dumb ass attack and couldn't help it.
*glances over to a dowel with the ends sanded round, then back to Krakjoe.* “Right.†Earl: A government agent speaking with the enemy with the sanction of the US government in order to establish inroads for peace is far from making them a trator, that is being a patriot, and potentially is that government agent just doing their job. A government agent speaking with the enemy without the official sanction of the government is not necessarily treason, but can lead to suspicion of that person, especially if we don’t know what the talk is about. If the government agent was sharing state secrets and technology, or giving troop movements to the enemy during a time of war, then that IS treason, but the person cannot be convicted of treason unless at least 2 witnesses come forth. Further, any US citizen giving aid or comfort to the enemy is also guilty of treason under Article III, section 3 of the Constitution of the United States: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
LOL this is perfect. Your forgetting the fact that the only reason gtech started this post is so he could insult democrats, as an ex air force boy he hates anyone who prefers to talk instead of clusterbomb. Plus he has been trained how to think, its not his fault.
I always get a kick out of democrats and foriegn nutjobs who claim "but, but, but you just started the thread to attack someone," then they go right back to doing the same thing. Oh, the irony is deep! BTW I'm ex-Army, not Air Force. Not that facts would matter to you.
GTech, I would like to thank you for having the courage to volunteer to serve our country at the risk of your own life, in order to keep myself and other Americans safe from harm. Would you mind sharing a general summary of your non-classified duties?
Thank you Josh. I could write a short book on the general duties of any soldier, as they vary far and wide from what they do in field training to what they do in every day activites. I was in Field Artillery (13b) which uses self-propelled howitzers to fire artillery rounds down range in support of the Infantry. My last assignment was as an Army Recruiter in the Dallas, Texas area.
That's all you do unfortunately lately... guessing Why is it that it would be clear to you i have not read your post GTech?
Certainly. And bless you for helping to protect our infantry with cover fire. I myself am not cut out to be in the military (as my training and course in life require me to constantly question, and look for better ways even as I obey... that could get me and others killed), however I have nothing but respect for the brave service men and women who put their lives on the line for my freedom, and yet manage to resist giving in to the constant psychological damages that can be done on the battle field, and manage to uphold the honor of our nation with their conduct abroad.
My spirit? Yeah, i am feeling good today and especially having you cornered as you are now since evidently you have a hard time explaining what was so unclear about my post for you?
I hope you're not insinuating what i think you are I see you getting smaller and smaller GTech all most fearish to actually say something that makes any sense to my question. Scary cat... Sometimes it's necessary for you to be put on your place I'll have to leave you for now but i promise to check back to see if you actually can handle a grown man discussion or if you choose to continue the route of tactical denial as you have displayed so far.
wow. Now that is a cute and silly image. I do hope that they didn't harm the kitten in any way to produce it though.
I look forward to it. I've never seen you afford a "grown man" discussion before, so I'm anxious to see if you can actually do it. Will you be posting more pictures and cartoons to illustrate this new found interest? That first post in the thread you offered was a "miserable failure." Work on your implementation, gather your strategy and even practice if you need, then come back when you are ready. Sound like a fair deal?
Ahahahaha! GTech, you're deluded. No-one has ever 'owned' me in these discussions - I do recall backing you into a corner on weapons of mass destruction (you might recall this was the reason for war) but I let you off lightly since you were in an indefensable position - i.e. you were trying to defend the reason for war. Edz - those pictures are hilarious.