Ideally there should be a machine that tests babies to see if they are likely to be paedophiles, then we can throw those babies into a custom built baby-crushing-machine. Perfect!
Those are not Life in Prison inmates. They are relatively benign prisoners. Check kiters, fraud, non-violent crimes. They are working for incentives. More time off. If someone is in prison for Life, and there is not any chance of getting out, what leverage do you have on them? You want to make things hard for them, but unless you whip them with a cat-o-nine tails, they will just tell you to kiss their butt. If they work for extra TV, or better conditions, then aren't you defeating your whole agenda? It won't work with this kinda of scum. Additionally, there is the risk of escape. And then another victim. But then, the criminal will kill the victim to hide the crime/witnesses.
Like I already said, I don't mean that specifically I just meant as an example of the fact that we could make inmates work instead of killing them. As for the baby theory, that is by far the most ridiculous thing that has been posted here on the entire 7 pages, especially since there is such a strong feeling against abortion, which is hardly considered killing babies in my opinion.
Paedophilia seems to be a bit of a buzz word in society these days. As long as there are paedophiles and terrorists the common drone won't be short of anything to be outraged about. But as long as we have idiots driving doctors out of thier homes because they think paediatrician is the same as paedophile, Or 16 year old boys being put on sex offender registers for having sex with thier 15 year olf girlfriend i don't think we can afford to execute "paedophiles". No doubt the outraged masses will now claim, through thier moronic logic, That i in some way support child rape and paedophilia. So i'll sum it up in simple words that are easily absorbed in to your red mist soked minds; Killing kids is bad, Having sex with kids is bad.... But i don't trust a bloodthursty mob, Which is what you are, To decide who get's to live and who gets to die. And the comment earlier about there being an acceptable number of innocent men that could be killed due to botched trials made me want to vomit. if i had my way you wouldn't be allowed to vote.
You all might want to take a look at www.moraloutrage.net which deals with news and issues like this.. I don't condone pedophilia, but I do insist on knowing the facts.. there are two sides to almost every issue. A rush to judgement and an "acceptable risk" of executing an innocent individual is not acceptable in my book.
When its a creepy old dude and a young child - I opt for the buzzsaw of doom. From the makers of Fried Chicken Chairs and Inject-a-Perp.
Nobody is in a rush to execute just anyone, but instead for the people who are proven to be pedophiles.
Yeah but they are saying that guys that are like 18 that have girlfriends that are 17 that willingly have sex with them are pedophiles, but that and a 40 year old dude rapes a 12 year old girl is completely different.
I think anyone can tell the difference between the two issues Joker, i seriously doubt that anyone would class an 18 year old with a 17 year old to be a kiddy fiddler
Toopac made the mistake of thinking US court systems had anything to do with logic and justice. Logically, when one of the people involved is under 18 the difference in age should be taken into consideration. When both are above 18, age shouldn't matter. But that's not how it works.