CPM, PPC and PPA Ads Compared - Analysis Chart

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by Surf_Dude, Jul 12, 2007.

  1. #1
    Hi Folks,

    I just created a new page, which compares the -
    Advantages and Disadvantages, for both
    Advertisers and Publishers,
    for CPM ads, PPC ads, and PPA ads -
    http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/internet/cpm-ppc-ppa-ad-comparison.htm

    I will fix any errors pointed out, but more importantly, is any discussion relating to the topic. I hope we can get some good feedback about the use of these 3 types of ads, and which one might be the best to use in your individual situation.

    Any comments on my Risk/ Reward analysis?
    Thank you for your time.
     
    Surf_Dude, Jul 12, 2007 IP
  2. Nachsohn

    Nachsohn Peon

    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Nice one...
     
    Nachsohn, Jul 12, 2007 IP
  3. Deano

    Deano Sail away with me.

    Messages:
    890
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    From your page,
    You are able to select so it does the best paying ads or limits it to your choice of ads (there's a check box).
    For sites with lots of impressions, but covered with low click terms such as cell phone adverts, I feel it is better to use cpa (you either get 1500 1 cent clicks (ppc) or need to convert 0.1% of that traffic to get a $15 cpa commision.

    Overall I think you are very harsh on cpa ads, yeah there are some dodgy firms out there but overall they should perform well.
     
    Deano, Jul 12, 2007 IP
  4. Surf_Dude

    Surf_Dude Peon

    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Regarding the check box, it is my understanding that unselected ads are still being served, even if you specify your "choice of ads". I know this was true with Referrals 1.0 when I tried it. Has it changed in Referrals 2.0? Or do you still get "fill"?

    As far as "harsh" on PPA ads - maybe so. But that is the way it "shakes out" for me. As humorist Dave Barry likes to say, "I'm not making any of this up". Just reporting what I read on the forums. I didn't even mention the large, pending class action suit against CJ. I pulled my CJ stuff, simply because there has been NO DENIAL of any kind by CJ that this is going on. That's all I need to NOT hear. Logically, don't you think that some type of denial from CJ is Step #1? To me, no refutation = implied guilt. You know, the "Dick Cheney" method - type Dick Cheney into Google news.
     
    Surf_Dude, Jul 12, 2007 IP
  5. ajitjc

    ajitjc Banned

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Actual what is your personal experience from this?
     
    ajitjc, Jul 12, 2007 IP
  6. Surf_Dude

    Surf_Dude Peon

    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I don't know what you mean by "this". I have used various ad companies, including Google, Yahoo, CJ and others. My comments and observations have certainly been tempered by my personal experience.
     
    Surf_Dude, Jul 12, 2007 IP