I have no idea why they have taken a cached copy of this page but want to know if this practice is harmful to our page / site in any way. This is our page: www.homeless.org.au/runaways.htm This is the cached copy: http:// runaways-the.celebrityblog.net/cache.cgi/000100A/http/www.homeless.org.au/runaways.htm
Yes, i think it is harmless. But it looks nasty. You might want to let the doctor take a look at it.....
Well; I'm not a doctor; not even an expert; but I would ask them to remove it. Duplicate content and all that jazz. At first glance it looks like a 302 redirect; but a header check does show a 200 ok. Again; I'm not an expert. Someone else should offer their opinion.
I found it by doing a search: inurl:www.mysite.com as I had read somewhere about it revealing such practices. Our page is pr5 and the dupe is pr0 so it won't bump us out, but want to know if it will cause any other problems. Anyone experienced with this sort of thing causing harm?