In a newsgroup I frequent someone said: I beleive it was in relation to copies of coop. Is that true?
I dont consider booking exotic dancers adult... but i would definately be interested in a co-op type network that accepts marginal websites like mine.
Sorry, but thats just wrong.. I mean - *seems* the same I've already discussed this elsewhere, but at risk of repeating myself, purely because ppl do so love to jump to conclusions, I'll point out that a link exchange network is nothing new, and it's *not* unique to DP (regardless of whether it's opt-in (coop) or paid). It may seem the same, feel the same, look the same, yadda yadda, but that doesn't make it the same. In fact, the *ONLY* thing that makes the DP coop unique is the way link distribution is governed - ie Shawns specific weighting system. Sorry, but thems the facts. The coop works well, which is good, but lets be real, how many different ways are there to represent a group of text links ?? Cheers, JL
That would be me, and the place to register for the beta (if you've not already done so) is: Text Link Exchange Beta Cheers, JL
My reply was in the context of the rule that you cannot run other ad networks along with the Coop Network. Not as a judgement on the quality of your own Ad Network... Lighten up a little sheesh
I spent a week building a poker related site... and forgot that they aren't allowed in the coop. Have it over there gathering dust now