Compete.com, Quantcast, TrafficEstimate.com - Who is even close?

Discussion in 'Google' started by itworked, Apr 23, 2010.

  1. #1
    I did a test of a site that gets 122K unique visitors a month according to Google Analytics. The following sites said it got:

    49K - Compete.com
    70K - Quantcast.com
    127K - Traffic Estimate.com (pretty darn good)
    105K - SeoApp.net (also not bad)

    I would be curious if anyone else has done a similar test on these or other sites and what their results were.
     
    itworked, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  2. zoom

    zoom Peon

    Messages:
    1,244
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I have checked traffic for my site on all of them and they are not accurate at all.
     
    zoom, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  3. WishBone

    WishBone Peon

    Messages:
    2,566
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    And how about the actual traffic got from Analytics or Statcounter and compare to those traffic estimators..

    I agree with SEOApp and Traffic Estimate are way much better among them..
     
    WishBone, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  4. Sxperm

    Sxperm Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    142
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    225
    #4
    I would say all of them are not that accurate ever. However, if I have to choose one among them I would choose Quantcast.com over other ones. I have experienced most of them and found Quantcast is more reliable than others.
     
    Sxperm, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  5. Pixelrage

    Pixelrage Peon

    Messages:
    5,083
    Likes Received:
    128
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    None are accurate unless you're analyzing a site that has their tracking code on them. Otherwise they are typically WAY off the actual results and barely usable.
     
    Pixelrage, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  6. joshvelco

    joshvelco Peon

    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    No, all estimated far to high, or far to low for all of my sites.
     
    joshvelco, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  7. itworked

    itworked Member

    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    #7
    I was surprised in the test I posted above that two of them were actually close. Dumb luck?
     
    itworked, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  8. Adraco

    Adraco Active Member

    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #8
    Not luck, but they do function a little different. It also differs what they count as a visitor, when the tracking code/script is loaded during the normal page load and several similar variables. Of course they should be closer to each other, such a large difference can't really be justified but again, it really depends on how they are constructed, how you load/call them and so on and so forth.
     
    Adraco, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  9. woz2

    woz2 Peon

    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    I have a meta question: "Why do you care?"
     
    woz2, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  10. itworked

    itworked Member

    Messages:
    74
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    #10
    Fair question. The answer truthfully, I don't care that much. But I do buy sites occasionally and if there were a site that provided an accurate measure of another site's traffic it would be useful. What usually happens is you go poking all over the place for clues about the sites performance, you get info from the seller, some of which is accurate, some of which isn't, and you are generally in the dark. This isn't just about traffic but backlinks, revenue, etc. That's really the only time when I really care. Sometimes it is nice to see how the competitors are doing, but again, no big deal.
     
    itworked, Apr 23, 2010 IP
  11. China_girl

    China_girl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,095
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #11
    I think 90% of all Guaranteed companies might have fake traffic. I am sure they use some kind of PHP software that might route HTTP to get requests through a massive list of anonymous proxy servers or IP addresses. Did you check if the hit came from one of the anonymous or fake IP addresses the script stores in a database ?

    I am sure half of the traffic might be sent by the fake traffic PHP script which is unique and shows up as unique in the stats too.
     
    China_girl, Apr 24, 2010 IP
  12. jburdon14

    jburdon14 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    #12
    I have personally studied this and I can tell you that none are accurate really... They can give you a rough idea to the amount of traffic a site gets (high, medium, or low) but an exact number is impossible for all.

    I personally own a bunch of sites and some of my sites with lower alexa rank actually have significantly higher alexa rank, further proving inaccuracies.
     
    jburdon14, Apr 24, 2010 IP