Google has so much data to work with that it's inevitable that they could pick out the linkvault neighbourhood and the coop neighbourhood (even if it's a moving target). My experience has been that permanent links are more effective, but at this point I am really keen on a suggestion that was put forward in the LV forums (not yet taken up by their admins), but perhaps useful for the coop system: Basically to assign some weight to linking to undisputed high trust sites in a broad range of topic areas... basically in aid of widening the 'neighbourhood' to include really legitimate destinations. I know there are a lot of quality sites in both networks but there are also a lot of not so quality sites in both. By bringing in a wider variety of high trust sites into each neighbourhood... where am I going with this, anyone nodding there head here? With regards to people ignoring the coop TOS and running LV as well... burn MF burn... ban them all I say. Its clear, use one or the other on a domain or sub-domain... them's the rules so like it or lump it.
yup, I agree, and that is why I like to check and do some police'ing around and find the TOS breakers and post them here. The owners of those websites do find this thread at some point, and they ofcourse do not like this, thus explaining the red reps that come in, from agitated people, but for some reason, they just ignore the TOS.
Here i am again to bump an old thread. But i just couldnt resist. Heres another TOS breaker: seattlesound .de
This website was shown in my LV account, it was on some inner page, i dont have the URL of that inner page right now, i will search then report back. But since the website was in LV account, LV links should be somewhere.
I am back here again worldprayer . us using coop and LV together. I think it is still against Co-op TOS to use it like this. Am I right ?