Clinton Defends His Handling of Bin Laden/Terror

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by yo-yo, Sep 24, 2006.

  1. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #21
    You just defined why every moonbat on the planet hates Bush. He leads without thinking about his legacy or popularity. Clinton put his image and legacy ahead of the American people and he cost us dearly as a result.

    Personally I would rather the right decisions be made; all too often they are not the popular ones.
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  2. Rick_Michael

    Rick_Michael Peon

    Messages:
    2,744
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Do you really think those families want to look-up to the enemy? I'm sure most of the families think those people are either insane or cowards...wrong or right, I think it's better they think that. I wouldn't give any virtue to enemies.
     
    Rick_Michael, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  3. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #23
    Not on his watch. 5 + years now. Safer? Yes. More terrorists? No. Just more terrorist sympathizers.


    The government at the time, yes. aka, Clinton admin.
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  4. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #24
    I'm no clinton fan, but he handed that moron reporter his ass.

    Notice how when clinton was handing him his ass he tried everytime to change the subject? Notice how clinton didn't let him and didn't fall for that shit?

    Good job bill. You made people see FOX news for what they are and that is not pretty.
     
    noppid, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  5. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #25
    But isn't that what he has been doing for 6 years now?


    Only when he was cornered. He still took time to whip out that there Fox News card though.
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  6. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #26
    Um er, it has already been published. It's not breaking news.

    That there fox news got put in it's place and desparately tried to change the subject when it happened.

    Good stuff there!
     
    noppid, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  7. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #27
    So strapping a bomb to yourself or driving a car bomb into the enemy and losing your own life in the attack isn't "physically attacking" them? :confused:

    It has been so far. Morale and support continue on a decline. :cool:
     
    yo-yo, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  8. Cyrus255

    Cyrus255 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #28
    Bill Clinton actually put US troops ON THE MUSLIM SIDE in Bosnia, where AL QAEDA was "fighting on the same side".

    The Bosnian Muslim green berets called themselves the "1944 Handzar SS division" in reference to the Bosnian muslim who served under Hitler. They still wave the Nazi flag. That's who Clinton went in to "protect".

    Bill Clinton put US troops alongside Al Qaeda in Bosnia at the SAME time Al Qaeda was blowing up our embassies, the USS cole, etc.
     
    Cyrus255, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  9. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #29
    noppid, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  10. yo-yo

    yo-yo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Likes Received:
    206
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #30
    How can anyone blame bill clinton for 911.. oh wait... it's the ultra-right wing conservative nutjobs trying to blame him... you know the guys who would never admit they voted wrong even if the sky was falling :D

    Bush didn't do anything about bin laden or alquada (except stopping the fbi from investigating him and his family) the entire time he was president until 911 happened. Great job!
     
    yo-yo, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  11. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #31
    The problem is the young angry white males with low IQ's are either to young to remember, or simply starved for oxygen in the brain to realize these facts you site and the reason for each conflict.

    Again, the young angry white males with low IQ's will refute this claim by ingoring it completely.

    Hell, we supported the Northern Alliance (well tried to) in an attempt to kill Bin laden and the taliban (but billy shut this operation down), even though they were growing Opium.

    To this day we support the Northern Alliance to that end, even though....

    Sometimes you have to choose the lesser of two evils to get the end to justify the means.
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  12. Rick_Michael

    Rick_Michael Peon

    Messages:
    2,744
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    Most of the insurgency is not comprised of 'strap-on' suicide bombers...it's a mild part of the Al-Queda organization that came to Iraq. There's no viable connection between Mao or the Vietcong form of guerilla warfare and the current tactics in Iraq by insurgents. If anything, they're just trying to start a civil war in the country.

    You ask too many questions, chief, you need to start your own research. Or atleast try to kill the rhetorical questions.

    ummm....subjectivism...
     
    Rick_Michael, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  13. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    I don't know how much combat you have seen Rick, but I think its kind a asinine for someone sitting america, I assume living the soft life we americans lead, would think that Iraqi insurgents are pussies.

    I would venture that if our infantry was stripped of its armor, it air support and satellite support , and had to fight the insurgents with equal arms it would be a pretty even match. As good as our soldiers are, a lot of those insurgnets have already vertrans of one or more wars.

    I think he was totally cool, he talked to the interviewer like people should talk to hack fox reporters, I think wallace looks a little sniveling weasel.
     
    ferret77, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  14. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #34
    No I'm pretty sure it is because they are pussies!:eek:
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  15. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    yeah look how good thats working so far
     
    ferret77, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  16. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #36
    Why would he, yo? Bush did 9/11, right, planting bombs in all the towers and getting cargo planes to hit the towers? What does al qaeda have to do with 9/11 at all? I'm confused. :confused:
     
    lorien1973, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  17. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #37
    It was the other way around. Clinton was the one changing the subject. Did you watch the entire interview or did you just watch the 1:15 minute out takes on the liberal news site of choice?

    Clinton at one point slammed his fist down on a peice of paper claming that he was told that this subject would NOT be brought up, and that he was there to talk about Clinton's initiative on climate change.

    A range of issues were discussed. Clinton litterally snapped when questioned about why he did not do more about Al Quaeda. Of course we know why he snapped.

    Talk about getting your ass handed to you. We need more Clinton interviews. I expect to see Hillary snap. That's what she does. Billy has been much more cool in the past.

    My suggestion to those that did not see the ENTIRE interview is to watch it. You'll have a much different view.
     
    Mia, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  18. noppid

    noppid gunnin' for the quota

    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    232
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #38

    Isn't repeating yourself a sign of something? Isn't resorting to insults in a debate a sign of something?

    Here's a good one for you... Angry White Female from that there FOX network don't like being treated like a FOX news guest.
     
    noppid, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  19. Cyrus255

    Cyrus255 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #39
    WOW. No one responded to what I put in Big words.

    Bill Clinton actually put US troops ON THE MUSLIM SIDE in Bosnia, where AL QAEDA was "fighting on the same side" as Clinton.


    Stop conveniently ignoring that and using your circular logic!

    9/11 was the FIRST Islamic attack under Bush's watch. And afterwards Bush invaded TWO muslim countries and overthrew radical regimes hell-bent on the destruction of the West. Granted, he hasn't banned Islam like he should, or forced them to accept other religions, and execute all who murder apostates, (Mohammad commands muslims to kill muslims who leave the faith) which will only lead to a resurgence of those following Mohammad's command to kill or convert. The largest US muslim group is the Nation of Islam which is dedicated to killing all white men (as sistah souljah and louis farrakhan so eloquently describe). Islam means "to submit" after all. Oh and Ba'ath Iraqi WMD, they're in Ba'ath Syria, and judging from Bush's cussing about Syria, he knows and we'll invade them too whenever we have free hand. He'll just release the report when we're ready.

    Clinton had a WTC attack, and DID NOTHING. Clinton had embassy bombings, and DID NOTHING, Clinton had the USS cole, and DID NOTHING.
    Not one senior Al Qaeda official killed.

    All the while, when Muslim Nazis who claim they are bringing about the "fourth reich" in Bosnia are under attack, Clinton RUSHES to their aid!
     
    Cyrus255, Sep 25, 2006 IP
  20. ferret77

    ferret77 Heretic

    Messages:
    5,276
    Likes Received:
    230
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    I watched the interview, he said 50% would be on global innitiative, 50% on whatever else

    is there more then this 15 minutes aired yet

    http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/24/fox-clinton-interview-part-1-osama-bin-laden/
     
    ferret77, Sep 25, 2006 IP