Sure you do. You either worship THE GOD or you worship that which is the alternative; but you worship something, even if it just yourself (you being your own little god). Now then are you telling me that you're nothing? So what??? Take "1-6" as a whole, instead of trying to individualize them, since you don't live anywhere in this "VERY VERY VERY VERY big universe" except on Earth. And NO, "There" could "be an earth around one of them", but where is it? But "circumstances" aren't "any different" now are they, and nor have they been since documented History began. Okay, name me one way, without outside/external assistance, can a person kill him/herself??? Also, for scientific inaccuracies: Where are these "reasonably wide range of distances where earth life could live"? When has someone lived there? Where are the Human populated areas of The Sahara? And those Humans of Antarctica? That is what "The revolution of Earth around the Sun", means, isn't it. But you can explain to me how gravity is a property of matter. Again, there are those who would differ with your supposition; but nonetheless, my point was made. And when was it any different? How long did it take to go from non-self-conscience awareness, to "self-conscience awareness"? And how do we know this to be so. Did someone just one day wake up and say, "I've evolved from non-self-conscience awareness to self-conscience awareness, by the way, what time is it, and what's today's date???"
In the kingdom of the blind, the one eye is king; you have proven time and time again, that you're a part of that kingdom, but you're definitely not the king. You just can't see.
I will be as frank as I can: I worship NOTHING and NO ONE. Not your god, or their god, or anything. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. This just shows me that you have failed utterly to understand my post, which I made perfectly sure to make extremely clear, with just this reaction in mind. Unfortunately, my clearest was not clear enough. I feel it is a failure of intelligence or insight on your part, as opposed to any failure of mine. Step 1: Walk over to a cliff Step 2: Jump Step 3: Die It's pretty simple, really.
I'll take that as a "no I don't have an argument to refute yours and will continue to clumsily try and be funny". Can we stay on topic? This forum has a policy against personal attacks. You can get away with it so long as your entire post isn't about me and you actually have some topic related substance. But therein lies your problem. Like I said before, you're going to eventually have to form a coherent argument and stop babbling. Sorry So that being said, Here it is for you again... FIRST - You like to call them "monkey bones". Fact is..... the cave drawings are only the tip of the iceberg. Sorry to say there is plenty of proof that neanderthal man was humanoid and intelligent. Guess what they found alongside those "monkey bones". Tools for hunting, evidence of their use of fire to keep warm, the list goes on. All studied, documented, and yes my uneducated friend, even photographed. Hide scrapers, points, backed knives, stick sharpeners, tiny saws, and borers. Please go educate yourself. If you can't accept me dismissing your bible as nonsense then I can't accept you dismissing these sources. You're going to have to PROVE why they are wrong. Not pose the idiotic notion that they are wrong just because they are not your bible. So which is it? Either you believe "monkeys" did all that.... or are you going to prove me wrong (because I think you really do believe that) and admit that notion is ridiculous. P.S. There is unfortunately a consequence.... The catch is, that once you admit that the notion that neanderthal man findings are "monkey bones" you expose your pseudo attempts at being funny with the "monkey bones" comments as absurd.... Then the joke's on you
Well, his strategy seems to be "When addressed directly, say nothing" How.... Well I suppose I would get an infraction for saying what that really is. I do think it is very funny when christians ignore science in order to try (and fail) to justify their beliefs.
It seems as though you believe that occasionally people will forget and/or believe that you've questioned me about something that I failed to answer and/or address. And based on your 'amen' posse, you may be on to something. However, at every turn, I have constantly and consistently countered any and every thing that you've tossed at me. . .and you just can't seem to stand the fact that I do it decisively, and with humor, at my choosing. Well, all "This forum" would have to do is to go back in this thread to post #128 when you started all these "personal attacks". Now is that "a coherent argument" enough for you? Come on now, "stop babbling"!!! Kinda like Noah's Ark, The Ruins of the Tower of Babel, The Walled Ruins of Jericho, The Dead Sea Scrolls, The Shroud of Turin, and more recently, what is believed to be the location of The Garden of Eden, huh? Now I'm certain you would never refer to me as that which you yourself are, as well ("uneducated"). . .so I'll just assume that there's no reason for me to tell you to "Please go educate yourself" regarding, these findings (by Science), because you have already done so, huh? Why do you attempt to demand that I "PROVE why they are wrong", but at the same time, not even the scientific data that you believe makes them true to you, is not even believed by a clear cut majority of the scientific community. And you really should try sticking with your own "idiotic notion(s)" and stop tying to guess the "notion(s)" of others, because you've shown yourself a dismal failure there as well. Guess what, the word 'Gravity' nor its definition is not in "The Bible", but I believe both the word and its definition is right/correct. BTW, isn't it atheism and/or Science which states that "you cannot prove a negative."??? No, I don't have to prove you wrong, because I can take the datum from the same source (as well as others) that you did, and formulate my theory (just as someone did for the one that you believe), which is just as believable and viable as your. . .especially with the recent discoveries (within the last 50-75 years) of primates utilizing tools in their everyday lives.
Denial... You admit that it is impossible to prove a negative, yet the very crutch of theism is that you can't prove that the deity being supported doesn't exist. Apply it to yourself, too.
No, the truth is you literally just started trying to form coherent arguments after I forced you to do so by repeating facts over and over again until you had no choice but to try and refute them. lolwut? No, my simple reading comprehension challenged friend, no that is not a coherent argument. Read the post again. I was mocking your attempted humor while dodging a question. I then went on to ask you a topic related question. Ironic YOU POINTED TO POST 128. It's proof of what I said before, it's taken me a while (that was 10 DAYS ago) to get you to understand that no one is laughing at your terrible jokes and that at some point you were going to have to start forming coherent arguments. You're slowly coming around after a week and a half, but now you've got to deal with these pesky facts. BWAHAHAHAHA........BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA. Did you get that from your weekly christian monitor newspaper for elderly evangelicals? <begin school session> A) There is no conclusive evidence that Noah's ark has been found. Stop making shit up. B) The dead sea scrolls - are nothing more than the earliest known writings of the old testament. What relevance do they have here? If anything they are just one more version of the many bible versions and translations making it all just a jumbled pile of screw up. That you base your beliefs on. C) The shroud of Turin has been debunked for years now. Where the hell have you been? D) Just because there is a city named Babylon that that scripture writers used for inspiration for a fantastical story doesn't mean you can walk up to any ruins in the area and go AH-HA! It's the tower of Babel. The irony here is that some christians point to carbon dating as evidence that it is in fact the tower of babel. Same for Jericho. Yet some call carbon dating the anti-christ. The fact that you tried to use those as evidence on the same level as real archeological finds reeks of desperation. Uhh... wut? Dude if you think the "majority of the scientific community" doesn't believe neanderthal man existed you are clearly either making shit up as you go at this point or you are farther gone than I thought. Did you seriously just say that? I've been trying, you keep trying to avoid it Congratulations, you just graduated to second grade. I'm glad the bible allowed you enough control of your own mind to come to that conclusion. What does that have to do with your super book being wrong? OK so for the record Nehemia... Neanderthal man never existed. Correct?
Q. Why did the christian build his house in the shape of the letters g o d ? A. So that he could do whatever he wanted, in the name of god.
That's funny. Here's another joke... A Sunday school teacher asked her class, “What was Jesus’ mother’s name?†One child answered, “Mary.†The teacher then asked, “Who knows what Jesus’ father’s name was?†A little kid said, “Verge.†Confused, the teacher asked, “Where did you get that?†The kid said, “Well, you know they are always talking about Verge n’ Mary.†I thought that was cute.
...but why nowadays many scientist and educated person convert to Islam?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94rjdmZg8a0 and many more video like this... p/s:may s0meone explain to me..Now i very curious which one is right.Islam vs Christian.