You are right, people should only except your interpretation of who is Christian and who is not, after all compare to you the new messiah, even Jesus was full of BS and didn´t know what he was talking about.
so u r proud for following policies - which has nothing more than showing hatred towards other religions ?
yep! that's true, its only the bunch of idiots who are terrorists - these guys don't do any good - like improving the life style of the people, they are only interested in harming others
....rooted in an idiosyncratic interpretation of the Bible Perhapse not the interpretation of the Bible but the interpretive Bible itself that is the improper message. The KKK represent not the Christians but the Jews who were the crucifiers as the agents of evil. The representation of Christianity is the authority / lack of that allowed the perpetrations to occur without recourse as is endemic of their response then and repeated through history in deference to evil i.e. the KKK is an example of evil being stopped not by Christians but those fighting evil as the true believers in the message of Jesus, the triumph over evil being the path for remittance than the self serving, unwarranted message of the Christian Bible. Evil triumphed over Jesus is the crime and its allowance is the root of terrorism - what is lacking in the Bible is the condemnation of the event that would lead to the prosecution of the vested authority and the perpetrators of the event that continues to exist to this day that must be rectified and reconstituted in the Bible for it to have its proper meaning. Amageddon, the triumph of good over evil not mentioned in the Christian Bible is the true message of the slain Saint. A conclusion of Armageddon as prescribed in the Christian Bible if "allowed" will be the final act of mankind. The Christians have no right to assume the cross for their symbol as they do not place themselves on it in the struggle against evil.
it is funny when people post nonsense without doing the least amonut of research. If breeze just looked a little bit he could have found this.` Why KKK burns cross
you are right i have also seen these types of cases where people start converting their religion for money and also some other benefits.
I believe the Christians would just as well say they (KKK) are not Christian in the same light I am saying they are Jewish. I am just saying in regards to the religions connection it was the Jewish congregation that actively put the individual onto the cross while it was the Christian congregation that did nothing to stop them - I find both equally guilty in the same act. The KKK represent those that used force as did the Jewish and again it was the Christians that stood by and allowed the crime to occur while being committed in deference to the Christian Bible. The point being made was Jesus became a saint by virtue of a stand against evil that brought him to his death and those who abandoned him (Christians) have not a right to chose him as their leader without bringing the perpetrators of the crime to justice, they are equally guilty of the crime. Jesus was chosen by the Almighty for his purity against evil that tragically culminated in his crucification and the parties involved both Christian and Jewish must repent their deed before acceptance and remittance. The concoction of the Christian Bible, the son of God is not why the saint was chosen and is a myth. The true religion is simply remittance to the original Garden accomplished through the conquering of evil and is the path shown by the example of the crucifixion. Allowing the Inquisition, even if not participants as "true" Christians claim, remains the root of Christian Terrorism - their alowence of evil than putting an end to it.