I don't know, maybe it's just me, but the smilies here don't do any justice to what originally the smilies were supposed to mean. I mean, call this whatever you want, but this is not a smile: This looks more like someone is gloating over somebody else's misfortune (or something like that). This is definitely not a frown: It looks more like "What?!" "Huh?" This is definitely not confused: And I have no idea why this is Roll Eyes? Anyway, I really think the smilies here could be better (and easier to use). I, sometimes, am not sure if I can use them, because I am not sure if the person on the other end will understand that I am just extending a friendly smile and not laughing at him/her.
Yeah... unfortunately there aren't a lot of smileys to pick from out there that are vector/SVG based. If you know of any, I'd be happy to look into it. The upside of vector-based smileys is they scale infinitely (zoom in on them to see what I mean)...
I don't, but maybe some good DP people can create something without any copyright claims and what not. As a favor.
But on the positive side...(yes there is always a positive side) the smilies go well with the DP green motif, no?
May be. That green motif (this particular shade) is the color of the US dollar currency. I like it. However, the smilies look more like little aliens or moon people with strange contortions. Again, may be it's just me.
Aussies are aliens aren't they? So...what shade of green do *you* see these smilies in? (just trying to stay on topic)
Means you need vector based smiles only right? and which format will best fit ? AI/SVG/EPS or any other? But I really don't like these green smiles.. when smiles come in my mind then I can think about yellow color only (unfortunately) Lolz when new forum is migrated and checked this new smiles the the first thought came in my mind was same "What this 2 antenna doing on smile's head?? Are these Dp servers shifted to Mars? " and thanks for opening this thread
SVG is the best format for web/based vector stuff... (AI/EPS can be converted to SVG as long as it only uses things supported by the SVG spec).
Thanks malky. I just had a quick look through that thread. Seems like the problem is to do with vectorization. I've actually got a software that can definitely vectorize all those smilies. Don't really want to do it if people don't like those smilies though. Let's see what others think first...
I would disagree with that (I know, shocking)... SVG is painfully and grossly inefficient due to it's plain text delivery -- just look at a SVG version of a font (as needed for old iOS devices) where most of them by themselves are twice the size I'd allow for an enitre page's template of HTML+CSS+SCRIPTS+IMAGES! ... that said, If I wanted vectors, I'd consider using a webfont, but really they are just another of the things I have to block to even use this site due to their being system performance robbing garbage. (honestly I have most of the 'static' subdomain blocked now for everything coming from it being what was making the site painful to even visit.)
If you are getting SVGs delivered in production as plain text, whoever built them has no clue what they are doing. And if some is building SVGs that are even remotely larger than PNG counterparts, then they also have no clue what they are doing. Take the main logo in the header here... It's SVG and is about 1KB. Compared the a PNG version which is about 8KB. Unless you are retarded with designing stuff, *not* using SVG is grossly inefficient.