Can you please suggest me best webhosting as per our website requirements

Without knowing anything about your needs, the three hosts I recommend most often are SiteGround, Lightning Base and CloudWays. SiteGround if it's a blog, Lighting Base for business websites (faster, but more expensive) and CloudWays if you need your site to be able to scale (they're a cloud VPS). You'd also improve your uptime to essentially 100% with a CDN like CacheFly, which is my faster than CloudFlare and super cheap, while CloudFlare is free, but not very fast.

 

What is the reason you recommend these three providers? do you have any personal experience with each of them? if so, how long have you been with each of them and what do you host ? URL's of your websites would be nice us to see and check if one of us should trust and follow your recommendation.
Thank you.

 

I have a number of clients on Flywheel, the site you'd find by searching my user name is on Lightning Base (sans CDN currently, but with some plugins that help with speed) and I just use SiteGround for a personal blog and as a sandbox, but they are the easiest of the bunch to find lots of sites hosted on to test yourself. I wont give you any personal or client site URLs. One of my old business sites is still on Flywheel though - bigoseo.com

Don't take my word for it. Find sites hosted on each, find rough equivalents on other hosts, run load time tests that match what you expect for your project and decide for yourself. I don't yet have a standardized system for the tests that I do, so I can just give you recommendations - I recommend each for the sort of project I specified because those were the best that fit those needs in the testing I've done, which generally mirrors a small to medium sized business site.

If you have a high traffic site, that needs to handle big traffic spikes, I'd recommend you check Review Signal out. They aim their tests at that sort of thing - showing specific data - although the hosts know they are being tested, while with my tests they don't. They make a pile of money from their recommendations, while I'm still just doing mine in my free time - hopefully I'll be able to get to where they are eventually, with the structured, fairly scientific testing.

 

Is that 200 concurrent connections? If so you're probably heading towards exceeding the size for a standard shared host. Maybe you should start looking at VPS or semi-dedicated hosting with a bit more resource dedicated to your site.