Um I have no idea... $100? The intro is way too long and all of the images used are pixelated, with no option to skip it. Once you actually get into the site I have no idea what I am supposed to do. Do you sell things? Make things? Pretty confusing. Need a better call to action and functioning shopping cart...
I agree the intro is too long, and the images are pixelated, which is unappealing... but I will say that the color scheme is kind of nice... but also I agree there's no direction, I don't know what to do, so the color scheme only holds me for a minute.
thanks for the comments mates this site was not fully completed because .... my client gave nly Rs 3000 and so i dint finish his site with skip intro and all this was my first web design freelance project and they disappointed me without paying me..i had those points in mind which u have commented. thanks again
Let's see , we'll start with 100 points and start taking them off for things that are 'bad'. -5 : Since splash pages are an annoyance on most every "top ten don't list" -10 : Splash is fat bloated flash based with no graceful fallback content, so people who want to tell you where to shove flash can't even get to the 'main.html'. -10 : Over-sized header and flash banner once you get to the actual page push CONTENT clear off the screen making the user have to scroll down to see anything useful at even 1024x786 -5 : Flash banner chewing bandwidth for an annoying animation effect -5 : Absurdly undersized fixed metric (aka px) fonts on the content... another. -5 : dark grey text on black is at the edge of accessibility norms. Insufficient contrast makes it hard to read. -5: no hover effects on any anchors, makes it hard to tell what's a link and what isn't. -10 : Page is 432k total making it painful to load and wasting a horde of bandwidth for 1.9k of content and four content images that shouldn't be more than 10k apiece... 9k of markup for 2k of content and four content images is NOT a good sign... Especially in a tranny doctype with no meta's. -5 : part of the previous - using 320x372 images wasting bandwidth when you are only showing them at 150x175 -5: 23 validation errors means it's not HTML, it's gibberish. -10 : Tables for layout - when there's NOTHING warranting the use of tables. -10 : Nested tables with single TD per TR - there is no reason to EVER do this. -5 : Presentational attributes like ALIGN that have no place in modern markup. -10 : Non-semantic markup and even the use of tables is incorrect... When you have a heading it should be a TH or CAPTION, not a TD with a class on it... Your paragraphs should be paragraphs, not a classed DIV with double breaks inside it. If you have a heading like "Welcome to Fashion Attitude Inc." it should be in a HEADING tag, not just thrown into a TD any old way as CDATA. -5: empty elements with non-breaking spaces for no good reason. You want padding, USE PADDING. So that's... hmm... -5 points. Sorry, it's not 'worth' anything.