Can someone explain this? (PR-related)

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by rlynch, Aug 11, 2006.

  1. #1
    so i have a website, A, that i was fortunate enough to get some nice PR8/9 links to it write off the bat

    this boosted A to a PR5

    i then created 3 more sites, B C and D, and cross-linked them all with A

    thus, B C and D now are PR6

    the funny thing is, A is (seemingly) dropping to PR4

    A has some 40,000 pages indexed, while B C and D have maybe 25 combined

    what do you think is happening?

    am i being punished for having too many pages indexed so quickly?
     
    rlynch, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  2. FUCA925

    FUCA925 Peon

    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Are sites B, C, & D related in any way to site A? By related, I'm referring to the topics each site covers. If they are totally unrelated and you're trying to pass on PR from a high PR'd site to those not related, the SE's will catch on to this and devalue those links to little or nothing. It can also lead to site A's PR dropping as well.

    It could in fact be that you obtained too many links in such a short time.
     
    FUCA925, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  3. duilen

    duilen Active Member

    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #3
    It depends on how you cross link your sites. Are you passing authority back to A from B, C and D? Are you cross linking B, C and D? How many outbound links do you have on A? Do you have inbound links to B, C and D from sources other than A? There are a lot of factors that come into play here.
     
    duilen, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  4. duilen

    duilen Active Member

    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #4
    Unless G has seriously modified their PR algorithm the semantic relationships of pages linked together should not effect PR.
     
    duilen, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  5. LinkBliss

    LinkBliss Peon

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    How did you get such good domains? A.com, B.com, C.com etc.

    Eric
     
    LinkBliss, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  6. Sem-Advance

    Sem-Advance Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,179
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #6
    You divided / diluted the PR of A by outbound links to B C D.

    PR 101 really,,,,,
     
    Sem-Advance, Aug 11, 2006 IP
    Smyrl likes this.
  7. rlynch

    rlynch Peon

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    all related to same market

    ya i was thinking i might be a victim of my own "success"

     
    rlynch, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  8. rlynch

    rlynch Peon

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    all the sites share the same footer, which contains links to A, B, C and D

    there are only a handful of outbound links (excluding ones to B, C, D)

    only links (that i know of) pointing to B, C and D are from A

    what i dont get is that A, the main site that is directly linked to the PR8/9, is a PR4/5, while B, C and D are PR6 each

     
    rlynch, Aug 11, 2006 IP
  9. rlynch

    rlynch Peon

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    so should i remove the outbound links?

     
    rlynch, Aug 12, 2006 IP
  10. Sem-Advance

    Sem-Advance Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,179
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #10
    You could but no reason to.

    What you also forget is other sites link into your pages and as such add PR value....so while A is passing a lower value to a page with a higher PR there could be outside factors at play.

    Another issue is the time frame it takes Google to recognize and count the value of links.
     
    Sem-Advance, Aug 12, 2006 IP