Buying featured links then adding "no follow"

Discussion in 'Directories' started by donttrustthisposter, Nov 11, 2006.

  1. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #21
    Honestly, don't worry about recip links - link until you are bleeding from your eyes. As long as you link to quality sites, there should be no problem.
     
    Phynder, Nov 11, 2006 IP
  2. donttrustthisposter

    donttrustthisposter Peon

    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    91
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Please. I never said that. But approving links changing them from 1 way to recips will hurt me. Certainly won't help. If I paid some guy $50 I want a one way link.

    Guess I'm crazy. Yeah I get what's done is done but from an SEO standpoint would you approve, decline, or no-follow em when they link back for FREE.

    The census is to ask and that's what I'll do. thanks.
     
    donttrustthisposter, Nov 11, 2006 IP
  3. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #23
    Sorry - what were you saying here?
     
    Phynder, Nov 11, 2006 IP
  4. donttrustthisposter

    donttrustthisposter Peon

    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    91
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    I'm saying;

    Recips can cancel each other out OR not "weigh" as much.

    Some search engines DO cancel, most deflate weight. No? I helped make a search engine that did.

    Major ones I agree probably at least at this time don't cancel out.
     
    donttrustthisposter, Nov 11, 2006 IP
  5. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #25
    Then what are you crying about?
     
    Phynder, Nov 11, 2006 IP
  6. aspidov

    aspidov Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,875
    Likes Received:
    272
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #26

    I am sorry but I think you are being a dumb ass. If they submitted to be featured, then deny and refund the money. If they submitted to be regular (which is supposely free) then dont approve and dont refund and dont give a damn. and dont waste our time answering stupid questions.

    wtf is so confusing?
     
    aspidov, Nov 11, 2006 IP
    Phynder likes this.
  7. donttrustthisposter

    donttrustthisposter Peon

    Messages:
    1,477
    Likes Received:
    91
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Sorry for wasting your precious time. I just wanted to know if the option of approving but approving them with no-follow was a viable option and everyone including yourself gets their panties in a bind.

    Don't bother submitting to any of my directories, or wasting your time to answer what was supposed to be a simple question. Thanks.

    The answers have been bitchy ( at best ) and have basically been the following;

    1) No go screw yourself
    2) Recip links are good
    3) You're an idiot
    4) You're wasting my precious time.

    Thanks guys.

    I run a fucking free directory to add to that I pay out money to promote your free listings and didn't want to get stuck with recips and was wondering if the no-follow attribute was the way to go.

    But somehow I'm the idiot wasting YOUR time.

    Was hoping starting this thread to get a

    "Ah, yes here's what I do in that situation.."

    "The best way about that is"

    "Actually a 3 way link option can work here's how..."

    Nope not from this lot. I'm an idiot, WTF is my problem, and I'll go ahead and fuck myself.

    Please erase this thread as to not waste any precious goddamn time from these SEO gurus.
     
    donttrustthisposter, Nov 12, 2006 IP
  8. aspidov

    aspidov Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,875
    Likes Received:
    272
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #28
    Great. thanks!
     
    aspidov, Nov 12, 2006 IP