Bush's Recent WWIII Comments... opinions?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by drmike, Oct 20, 2007.

  1. soniqhost.com

    soniqhost.com Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,887
    Likes Received:
    96
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #21
    Would you want a mentally unstable individual to have an assault riffle in your neighbor? Would you want a pedophile to leave next to the school you send your children too? I would assume the answer would be no because based on their previous actions these people pose an increased risk to your children and family, but who are we to say who can own a gun or who can live here or there. Which is the same situation with Iran and nuclear, weapons based on their previous actions and stated desires, Its not unconceivable to think that Iran with nuclear would be a destabilizing force in the region and for the world
     
    soniqhost.com, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  2. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #22
    hahaha projecting some local cowboy with a gun to international politics and world order shows how informed NOT you are :rolleyes:
     
    iatbm, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  3. soniqhost.com

    soniqhost.com Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,887
    Likes Received:
    96
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #23
    You have nothing constructive to say (Because I'm right) so you say I'm not informed in world matters, which you are wrong.
     
    soniqhost.com, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  4. drmike

    drmike Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #24
    I think you totally missed my point... I would prefer if all countries gave yp nucular weapons... However since that will not happer, who gets the right to say what countries can and can not have them... yes Iran has said they want to destroy Isreal.. obviously not something I agree with them on... but look at the US... or more realisticly... Bush... he clearly wants to destroy Iraq and Afghanastan... or atleast rape them of their oil and natural resources and blow up a bunch $hit in the process... so why should such a violent.. quite possibly the most violent country in the world, the US, be allowed to have nuclear technology? Sure if you play into Bush's claim of wanting world peace and to protect everyone it would make sense for the US to have nukes... but I think his actions speak quite the contrary of these.
     
    drmike, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  5. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #25
    Did you read my post about inspectors visiting Iran in September ?

    Check at what I replied ! It was your post so yea I can say you are not informed.

    I will help you : http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=4897670&postcount=16

    Check your statement ! If you read and had your brains brainwashed that does not mean that the rest of the world don't have the info about what is happening around the world. Man it happened month ago when Iran let UN inspectors visit iranian nuclear facilities ! Now go read IAEA statements after they saw what is going on !
     
    iatbm, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  6. drmike

    drmike Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #26
    iatbm... I am sorry to have to ask.. but are you Corey Feldman??? Your similaries are stricking... I am assuming you can not be because you sound much more intelligent than I would imagine Mr. Feldman sounding.. but I had to ask.
     
    drmike, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  7. iatbm

    iatbm Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    352
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #27
    hehe :D Corey Feldman ... of course not :p
     
    iatbm, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  8. DevilHellz

    DevilHellz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,296
    Likes Received:
    141
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #28
    LOL. Thanks for the laugh :eek:
     
    DevilHellz, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  9. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #29
    iran is a country that will change from inside if given enough time.ahmadinejad knows this and that is why he wants to provoke west to attack them.

    reality is that they have not started a weapon program that we know of
    we can only set them back the time it will take to manufacture the machinery
    and repar their facility and they will accelerate their efforts and may even try to buy some.

    i would like to have a very dynamic negotiant with Iran to resolve their external policies without involving their internal policy. then work on making them deal with their human right issues with public pressure and more diplomacy. let iranian people deal with it..
     
    pizzaman, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  10. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #30
    Of course not. It's not promoted in the MSM, and even if it is, just a one day soundbite. To get this kind of information, you have to go to the CBC, the BBC, Al Jazeera English or DemocracyNow.

    As an example of how out of touch the American public is with current developments, the Bush administration has stopped promoting Iran+Nuclear for some time now, and has shifted it's propaganda almost exclusively to Iran+IEDs.

    It's the same syndrome when you explain to uninformed people that Bin Laden was part of the radicalized Afghani resistance, sponsored and supported by the USA. Or if you tell them that we sold materials that could be used for chemical weapons to Iraq. Or that Saddam Hussein was once our ally before Kuwait. Or that we forced regime change for Iran in 1953.

    They just look at you like you're crazy, because for a lot of people (at least those that can remember), Middle Eastern/American relations began on 9/11.
     
    guerilla, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  11. N_F_S

    N_F_S Active Member

    Messages:
    2,475
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #31
    Whats sad is, US will fire up a BIG war in that region and at the same time US people will be safe. If US were to border with these countries, it would sh*t themselves and wouldnt care about Israel, about Kosovo, about Iran having nukes.

    Thats what I dont understand as well, why US should give a damn about Israel? In this case why they didnt come to Russia and did not fight russians to protect chechens, that wanted in *democratic* way to be independent? Double standards, they care only if they see smth good for them.
     
    N_F_S, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  12. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,826
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #32
    I didn't know that Bush still find Iraq not a big enough adventure that he wants to take on Russia :( How about adding China together with it.
     
    wisdomtool, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  13. drmike

    drmike Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #33
    I don't think Bush will rest until he has a conflict with pretty much every country.... I am guessing he was the tough kid in elementary that went around intimidating all the other kids and making them scared of him so he could steal their lunch everyday.
     
    drmike, Oct 20, 2007 IP
  14. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #34
    On the contrary, he's probably never done a day's hard labor in his life. He's had a life of privilege, and the narrowed education of fundamentalist nutjobs.

    Combine ignorance and self-righteousness, and that's the mold from which he was cast.
     
    guerilla, Oct 20, 2007 IP