Not really, even when the administration and Bush admit that they are wrong, Gtech will still insist that they are right. I suppose it is too much of psychological shock for him to admit that Bush can be wrong.
Looks like the local terrorist supporter group is trying to win over a new convert I've been gone for a few hours. Has AGS or gworld had a bad word for a terrorist yet? Probably not, huh?
Well IRAQ Please tell them to leave lol, i think thats a lie, i think they are saying leave by their actions, constantly bombing and shooting at US Soldiers, We shouldn't of interfered in the first place
Yeah, Iraqis suck, right rive5? They deserve to be taken over by terrorist groups and live under their rule. That's certainly what AGS and gworld are cheering for.
idk about iraqis sucking, but i know that there is going to always be terroist trying to take out there own and country and ours, but thats something we have to prepare for and try to prevent
I try and think about what will happen if we did pull out. I can't imagine the hell they will go through, being taken over by radical/extremist/terrorist nuts. But apparently some people want that to happen. I've never understood why.
Yeah i couldnt imagine that either, its hard to run a country that has been under dictatorship for centuries
Iraq was better off before we were there. Were dozens of terrorists running around planning and executing daily suicide missions? No. Were 100 Iraq citizens dying daily before we were there. No. Did people predict the complete and utter failure that Iraq is today before the first bomb dropped? Yes. Did Bush make a terrorist threat to the U.S worse? Yes. Failure. Miserable failure.
Who are "we?" Are you part of something bigger than yourself? Iraq was not better off. There were terrorists and terrorist training camps in Iraq. saddam was responsible for well over a million deaths, mass graves, torture, rape, acid baths, chopping off hands, etc. Did people predict failure? Probably. It isn't failed. Is the terrorist threat worse? We're doing a lot better in the 2000s that "we" (term used loosely) did in the 90s. Why do you want the US to pull out so terrorists can take over?
Meh, that's basically where I'll stop arguing. It's clear you have a one way mind set, and will ignore all evidence. As for your probably predicted failure comment. Well here: http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0924-07.htm "The United States and some of its allies are talking themselves into a corner. They are preparing their publics for a reflexive, costly, and wrathful "war" that will fail to ensure long-term security for anyone." --Sept 24, 2001 That's at least 1 person within my 4 seconds of searching.
You should have stopped about five posts ago. You've presented no evidence. Nothing but typical self-loathing leftist "blame America first" commentary. Clearly, anyone can see where it's derived from and what it's based upon with a source to (of all places) "common dreams." Who are "we?" Are you part of something bigger than yourself? Why do you want the US to pull out so terrorists can take over?
LOL someone else has picked up on your spooked mind GTech, your empty rhetoric against anyone that is against your lover Bush and the miserable failure that he is. I can only spend a few minutes a day here because of other commitments but it is so clear to see that you are still spooked by the absolute control the mainstream media has over you from this quote of yours a couple of posts ago: They have already been taken over by radical/extremist/terrorist nuts when your terrorist buddy Bush and his bum chum Cheney took them over. Rub3X said it best in just 3 words: Failure. Miserable failure.
Here ya go smart ass. Reputable sources of reputable officials warning of failure and lack of WMDs. Iraq was better off before the invasion: Stats - http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-28-gallup-iraq-findings.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001442_pf.html http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/02/25/ING0BO934H1.DTL http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/14282 Prediction of failure: Cia warned of Iraq anarchy - http://www.sharon-herald.com/theap/local_story_117214930.html Pre-war reports say agency predicted dangers of toppling Saddam's regime - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18854414/ Simulation of Iraq war failure - http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB207/index.htm CIA warning Bush that there were no WMDs: White House 'warned over Iraq claim' - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm White House knew there were no WMD: CIA - http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=67020 American wants out of Iraq: Congress legislation & Bush's veto - http://www.democrats.org/a/2007/05/house_democrats_1.php American people poll - http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/15116 I await your debunking of these links. Please no FOX "news" links as your source, thanks.
LOL Rub3X. GTech is one of the only people in the world that still thinks that the completely non-existent WMDs existed. He will dig out a shitty thread that he posted ages ago with many fools saying that they existed (no proof of course, just quotes) when it is now a proven fact that they did not exist. Good luck debating GTech mate, I have no idea what drives him 24/7 on this forum to support a terrorist like Bush but I am sure that he will frustrate you with his blatant denial to admit that Iraq is a disaster and it's all down to Bush and his corrupt PNAC CFR terrorist cabal. Good luck!