Bush to Syria, "Stop this shit"

Puhleeze... Californians are the most trustworthy source possible in this case. This is Californians pointing out liberal media bias. That's like Rosie O'Donnell calling someone fat.

 

Or a bull dike

 

That's the difference between me and you though. You want this to be about people and I want it to be about issues.

Let me know when you can debate issues without insulting people.

 

Just as soon as you stop insulting George W. Bush.

And actually, my issue is liberal media bias. You're the one who keeps talking about "people." In fact, your last post was an insult to me personally.

Moreover, you're the one who brought up the credibility issue regarding Californians and you're the one who keeps mentioning Fox News personnel.

Hmmm... who was your post supposed to be addressed to?

 

I probably returned the favor, yes, thanks for noticing.

Bush's policy sucks, if that insults him, fine, I can live with the label as an insulter. I'm certainly not going to blindly follow him just to appease anyone. If the shoe fits wear it.

My comments on insulting people were regarding each other, not anyone in the administartion or in the media. They are fair game. Shit, look at how much amusement Ann Coulter provided comedians, she's a service to our country in that respect!

California is the most liberal state in the nation IMO, they have draconian laws about most everything. Seems like a strange source for a right wing nut?

Opps, I tried to insult you again. Come on laugh, it's funny!

 

For the Bush supporters read this.

Sharp rise in Baghdad violence reported
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Bombings and shootings soared by 40 percent in the Baghdad area in the past week, the U.S. military said Thursday. An American general said extremists were preparing "an all-out assault" on the capital in a decisive battle for the future of Iraq. ........

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060720/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq


Are you supporting all those killings as well? For they came after Bush took the "right" decision.
st12

 

Does Medicare cover BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)?

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a ba, ba, ba, Booooossshhhh basher!

 

That article really makes me worry for all the troops working over there.

I wish I had a dime for everytime you posted some BDS banter. Granted, it would only get me about $7.40, but that would almost cover my commute to work with the gas prices we have.

Isn't the definition of crazy doing the same thing over and over expecting different results?

 

In your opinion, I guess the increase in violence are a work handed out by Bush. It's not. Bush has no control in it. Why not blame the terrorists for terrorising?

 

Speaking of those with advanced BDS, nice to see you back SU

It's sad when people are forced to drop out of the sixth grade. Here, let me help you with standard dictionary terms.
Definition of crazy:
1. Affected with madness; insane.
2. Informal. Departing from proportion or moderation, especially:
1. Possessed by enthusiasm or excitement: The crowd at the game went crazy.
2. Immoderately fond; infatuated: was crazy about boys.
3. Intensely involved or preoccupied: is crazy about cars and racing.
4. Foolish or impractical; senseless: a crazy scheme for making quick money.

Looks like another word for BDS

 

By your logic, if I walk over and smack you in the face, it's your fault.

You would make an awesome abused spouse.

 

You said:

"By your logic, if I walk over and smack you in the face, it's your fault.
You would make an awesome abused spouse."



I am sorry mister (Will. Spencer), how did Iraq smack U.S. in the face?
I see no logic, no facts to support what you are implying. If one looks honestly at the facts, he may come to a different conclusion about that "awesome abused spouse".
st12

P.S.
I feel like I am talking Chinese to non Chinese speaking people here. IMO U.S. won't be able to win the hearts and minds in Iraq. I don't see anything good that comes from the US presence in Iraq. The islamic fundamentalist moved there, nobody keeps record of the Iraqi casualties, some say 200K have been killed since the war started and keep counting. NOTHING GOES GOOD IN IRAQ MAN, ARE YOU ALL BLIND? Don't you know that what goes around comes around? Don't you know that U.S. created the talibans to fight the Soviets? It would be much better for the whole world (pardon me, I have to include US here as well, so this can have some credibility in your eyes) if Afghanistan was under the soviet influence. But naah, the U.S. must have their way or the high way. Unfortunately, the innocent paid the price for that. 1.1mln Died in Afghanistan (needlessly) and about 3K in nine eleven (by the former US friends). As I can tell, by the way you are thinking, you don't feel much of a pain for those 1.1mln afghanies. But for the 3K surely you do. And that is selfishness that will come to bite ya. All I can see is the blind leads the blind......unfortunately. And too many people driven by nothing more than self interest, getting what they want ..... at any cost, as long as they don't pay for it.
Take care, and God bless you.

 

Laterhorn, dont you have your own country to worry about?

All I know is that years into the war on terror, the violence has increased, dont know why, who to blame, or how to fix it. I have no control over this, all I can do is pay my taxes and vote.

 

It's alot like the war on drugs , except we know the CIA is to blame

 

@ Mia

*looks at the length and rantyness of your post*

Nope.. no nerve struck there

We'll have to agree to disgree on Fox. I know plenty of conservatives that will admit they know Fox is a conservative network. So I know it's not just me...

Point is you look at it see what you want to see. MSNBC is the most liberal network I know. Keith Olberman show pretty much kills any chance they'd have at trying to convince anyone they aren't liberal. Why do you keep arguing that point? You see the point is that there are liberal networks and there is Fox. The point I'm arguing is that Fox is NOT fair and balanced. They are a great counter balance to the liberal networks. Why can't they just wear that badge and be proud of it instead of claiming to be fair and balanced?

Here's my whole point in a nutshell.... There is nothing fair and balanced about a news talk show with conservative discussion leaders. The conservative show host controls the show, leads the discussion asks all the questions and flat out argues with liberal guests while agreeing with everything the conservative guest says.

Pretty cut and dry no?

 

Source? Or opinion?

 

But its just so easy.

I mean you can call him a warmonger, a profiteer, a hypocrite, the next hitler, a lying bastard, a fraud, a puppet, an extremist, a religious nutjob.
I could go on.
and I can back every one of those labels up.

 

Start backing everyone of them up. You don't need my permission.

 

(1)Warmonger.
He has started 2 wars and has threatened military action against every country in the "axis of evil"
(2)Hypocrite
Yet stands by and watches genocide in Dharfour, Invades Iraq under false pretenses, (Oil, Oil, Oil)
(3)profiteer
(Oil, Oil,Oil, Iraq, Iraq, Iraq)
(4)the next hitler
See warmonger
(5)a lying bastard
WMD,Oil, Oil, Oil
(6)Fraud
I promise to catch osama, oh wait, profiteering time.
(7)Puppet
Yes Enron, No Enron, 3 bags full Enron.
(8)Extremist
Your either with us or with the terrorists, lets bomb them all, yehaaa
(9)a religious nutjob
God told me to bomb them.

And im sure I could add to that.

 

Is that a Brontosaurus?

ha ha ha ha ha ha, that was funny a few years ago, but the joke is so wore out it doesn't make anyone laugh anymore. Time to catch up to reality. Gtech will probably go ahead and answer each one for you, but it will probably be a waste of time.