Bush goes Nixonian--invokes Executive Privelege

Yes. I do not claim to be an authority on it though.

Court ruled appropriately, so what's the beef?

Agreed. Apparently my repeated requests to stop being lazy have finally hit home. Thank you for stepping up to the plate.

Incorrect. You should check them and if you believe them to be so false, should openly contact your Congressman/woman who also probably voted on this very act, and have the entire house/senate shut down over it, forceably take over the white house, and put RP in so that he can issue strongly worded letters if we are attacked again.

So you would prefer our hands tied behind our back? There is no umbrella for operation. They are in the business of going after terrorists both you AND I have clearly shown this. You pretend as if the average America is at some risk here, yet you refuse to back this assertion up.

I'm not interested in the sthensthitive feelings of terrorists. I have only one concern....that they are off the streets. I'll let others worry about their sensitive little feelings.

If the big bad evil gobermint was doing what you suggest, these very people would not be out there right now. alex jones continues to prove this. There is a difference between questioning the government and ceaselessly attacking it with allegations. I'm always tickled when people that do this, pretend to hide behind the notion that they are asking questions. They are not. They are making unsubstantiated allegations based upon blind hatred. Think about it...who in their right mind would actually be worried about the little sensitivities of terrorists, were Bush not in office?

So we agree, paul is a wimp. And if our country is attacked, he'll do nothing more than issue a harsh letter. And this is why you support him? What does that say about you and what you really want for our country?

Point? Whose watch was it planned on? Whose watch did absolutely nothing to prevent such? And now, on whose watch, have we not seen another attack? I seriously question here, what you take exception to. Does blind hatred of Bush have you so mentally confused, that you are being sensitive to terrorists (supposed) rights to get away with murdering people in our country?

Oh, yeah! A harshly worded letter! That will teach them! Good gawd.

Clever! You probably thought I wouldn't catch on to it either, huh? I never said RP blamed the American people. I said he blames America first and he does. You know it, I know it and in general, the morons that support him know it because this is what they admire most about him.

Sorry, no, I will not familiarize myself with battered wife syndrome terminologies.

They equipped and trained themselves. Their religion dictates their actions. Blaming America first for their actions is simply futile. You demand that Bush take responsibility for perceived wrong doings, but do no such thing for those who attack us. Choosing instead to blame it on your own country. How sad.

There is no evidence to this. Zero. It's pure speculation on what you believe "might could" happen. Again, when we read the truth, terrorists are being detained. And sadly, you are disappointed.

Who says we are fighting on one front? This is an inaccurate suggestion. We work with many countries and sources around the globe. The recent London bombing plots led to new information about possible threats here in the US.

The economy is doing great. Is everything, everywhere perfect? No. I don't argue this. The economy is doing wonderful and has been. We can take that to a different thread if you want. I realize that because it's Bush, the proper response is to pretend it's bad, but good grief, the economy is one of the few places anyone with a remote level of honesty within themselves could possibly take issue.

I'll be glad when the time arrives. For all the nuts out there who are so delusional, that they believe elections will be suspended, it's going to be a great time.

There are no ideals of democracy being lost. Terrorists are having a much harder time doing their jobs. Some people, delusionally, believe it somehow affects them personally. Truth be told, it affects terrorists. Yet still, some are disappointed.

No human rights have been suspended. Oh, wait, you were talking about those sensitive terrorists again, right? Enemy combatant. Been around since the 1800s. I know some people are sensitive about those poor terrorists who want to blow up our country. I'm not one of them.

WTC bombing 1 was not even remotely on the same level as the real bombing. Those participants were already here in the US. What President wouldn't go after them? Those responsible for 9/11 were in Afghanistan. No comparison here.

We should fathom what he would do. And we can do so based upon what he says. He says he would write harshly worded letters. Is that how you want our country protected?

 

I'll respond to this nonsense tomorrow.

 

which means: