British Parliament debate wether to launch an Iraq War enquiry

This British Parliament is currently debating wether a official enquiry it to the handling of the Iraq war by Britain should be started now.

The debate is due to end in the next hour or so.

What do you guys think?

Should an enquiry begin while British troops are still in Iraq?

Or is it more important to start the enquiry while Tony Blair is still in office (he leaves next year)? Afterall, this is his war.


The BBC link

The Independant Link

The Guardian Link


edit:

The vote has now been taken and there will not be an enquiry. It was a narrow victory for the Government. A big shame.

 

Yeah we should do it. It's more than the US is willing to admit or do.

 

I agree. If you are willing to start a war then you should be held accountable for every little detail of the process.

 

Why do we need an investigation?

Cheney, Bush and Blair are bumbling idiots, they have lied, stolen and defrauded the citizens of the world, all of them should be removed from office, end of story!

This is just another stalling tactic!

 

Yeah but if the investigation happens, and reaches a verdict, something may come out of it?

 

Here in the USA we call it a landslide in the mid terms for Democrats and impeachment proceedings and convictions against Bush and Cheney!

 

That would be lovely!

Tremedous!

 

Voting machines in the US are rigged, so no worries about democrats taking the house! Right?

Besides, there's a guy who works at an all night diner in Montana who has a second cousin on his adapted uncle's side of the family, who has a third cousin in Arkansas that works for a company that has a machine operator whose sister-in-law on his Aunties side of the family has a dog that was run over by a car driven by alex jone's step-aunt who has son-in-law that lives in Shreveport who once made a left in Albuquerque and stopped in a gas station whose senior attendant has a distant cousin who worked for the government at Area 51 in the 1960s who has a grandson that works for the company that provides janitorial services for Diebold.

So it's safe to say, the voting machines are rigged

 

They sure as hell were in 2000 and 2004 GTech, but the Nixon appointed dead Supreme Court Justice that appointed your boy GWB made sure after James Baker bribed him!

 

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1276996461 <<< its impossible to rig a voting machine <<< YEAH RIGHT!

 

If you could rig voting machines and make Trillions for your buddies on oil and war fraud would you do it?

 

And even if you cant rig enough votes you can spread lies in a massive media campaign.

Its shocking that the American public stand for the dirty tactics and media manipulation used by political strategists.

I'm glad we have laws here to prevent such evil.

 

How do you figure that?

BP has bought and sold Blair for years!

 

I dont know anything about that.

I meant how media campaigns are used to manipulate voters and make them vote against their self interests.

Politicians all over the world will sink to as low as the laws allow.

I think US politics would benefit from some stricter rules regarding political campaigning.

 

Then learn more about the history of BP and Tony Blair and Iraq Oil

​

 

Give me a source from a reputable journalistic source and I will read it.

 

Don't get sucked in, mistermix. LOL

 

You don't have to learn from the foremost experts, you can choose to remain ignorant if you wish!

 

If there is any serious conflict of interests with Tony Blair in relation to links to businesses then the feisty British journalist will reveal it.

 

*waiting for Anthony's predictable post*