1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Breakup of the UK

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by mytechiestuff, Sep 16, 2014.

  1. #1
    In the next few days, the most successful partnership in modern times could come apart.

    The Brits, a joining together of fantastic people within the relatively tiny space of UK, were responsible for the first ever Industrial Revolution, the greatest technological advance in recent history.

    On the back of the industrial revolution, this tiny collection of Nations carved out for itself the largest global empire ever known and ruled it for over 200 years.

    The Brits were second to none in their contribution to the world of literature, art and music and so much more.

    And yet all of that could fall apart within the next few days if the Scots decide to go on their separate ways.

    The most astonishing thing is that according to all of the indications, the nation of Scotland is evenly divided in this one time choice with almost the same number of people against breaking up the UK as are for that choice.

    Should an irrecoverable decision, of indescribable importance, not be taken with the consent of a lot more than just half of the people who live there?
     
    mytechiestuff, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  2. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #2
    Can't really be that successful if there is even a need for this referendum!

    I can't see how Scotland will prosper if they vote Yes. It's a scary proposition and I hope the No vote wins. I've only spent a small amount of time there while I had about 3 years in England and through my job got to travel throughout England, Wales, Scotland and NI. There's history, and at times there's ill will but it does seem that "united" is the way to go.
     
    sarahk, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  3. mytechiestuff

    mytechiestuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,862
    Likes Received:
    58
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    153
    #3
    Sarahk wrote "Can't really be that successful if there is even a need for this referendum!"

    Well UK did produce stuff that literally changed the world, from the Magna Carta to Westminster the Mother of Parliaments, from the Scotland Yard to the Civil Legal Code, from the Steam Engine, the Computer the Hovercraft to the Television, the list is so long that it beggars belief that all of that came out of this small island nation.

    This tiny place smaller than Texas, is also the birth place of Alan Turing and Tim Berners-lee, of Captain Cook and Herschel, of Sir Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin, of William Shakespeare and Geoffrey Chaucer of the Duke of Wellington and Sir Winston Churchill, of the Beatles and the Rolling Stones and........

    I would say that it has been successful would you not?

    I think that it is clear that the Great Britain was not really called great because of its geographical expanse :)
     
    mytechiestuff, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  4. ThreeGuineaWatch

    ThreeGuineaWatch Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #4
    While we're tubthumping, you might like to mention also that a single college in England, yes just ONE college, has had more Nobel prize winners than every other country in the world bar 4. Only France, Germany, UK and the US have had more Nobel prize winners than Trinity College, Cambridge. Depends how you measure success, I guess.
     
    ThreeGuineaWatch, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  5. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #5
    Indeed, but how does the "union" contribute to all of that? Wouldn't the steam engine et al have been invented even if Scotland had been outside the union?

    And lets not forget that the union is responsible for the only civil war between different factions of Christians. Now that really is attributable to the "union".
    We colonials from the Antipodes tend to think of Cambridge as a University, college is where school kids go... but bygones. Are you saying Cambridge wouldn't have been as successful without the Union?

    Remember, I think it's a good thing, I'm just amused at your arguments relating to the importance of Scotland.
     
    sarahk, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  6. ThreeGuineaWatch

    ThreeGuineaWatch Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #6
    Cambridge is a university, a federal university comprising some 30-odd colleges. I was simply adding an oft overlooked fact to the list of our friend above. Re-interpreting history on the basis of what-ifs isn't my idea of fun so I have no clue how successful Cambridge would have been had England and Scotland never united. It seems that once the Scots and English stopped spending their time bashing each other over the heads with blunt objects and focused on more productive pursuits a lot happened in the world.

    Haven't been following the story too intensely but from what I have read it seems like there are too many half-baked ideas put forward by the yes campaign. For example, if there is a break, what currency will Scotland use, and who will oversee it? The pound is the UK currency, overseen by the Bank of England - how independent are you if a neighboring country manages your currency?
     
    ThreeGuineaWatch, Sep 16, 2014 IP
  7. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    2,612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #7
    So, any predictions as to the results tonight? The polls have closed.

    I have enjoyed my many visits to England and have made it a couple of times to Scotland, as well. Had a scary engagement with Customs Security in Lockerbie (I think that they thought a drug smuggling ring was on the plane) 20 years ago, but have enjoyed all of my visits (except the time I was sick with the flu in a London hotel.)

    I like haggis in Scotland. I like steak and kidney pie in England. I will pass, however, on Black Pudding and Marmite.

    I hope it all works out, one way or the other, as I find the Brits and the Scots to be friendly and good people.
     
    jrbiz, Sep 18, 2014 IP
  8. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #8
    @jrbiz - if you were in the UK 20 years ago does that mean you're blocked from being a blood donor?

    We get these ads on the radio pleading for blood donors but because so many kiwis travel there's a huge group who can't donate and they're probably the ones most likely to want to!

    Actually - Brits - what happens about blood donors for you guys? You can only donate if you were vegan or born after '95?
     
    sarahk, Sep 18, 2014 IP
  9. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    2,612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #9
    I was in the UK twenty-five years ago on and off with the most recent visit being less than two years ago. I do not believe that I would meet the cumulative time requirement. My visits were short for business. Here are the relevant American Red Cross rules that would disqualify someone from ever donating:

    <snip>
    From January 1, 1980, through December 31, 1996, you spent (visited or lived) a cumulative time of 3 months or more, in the United Kingdom (UK), or
    From January 1, 1980, to present, you had a blood transfusion in any country(ies) in the (UK) or France.
    <snip>

    I was travelling to the UK from 1985 - 1996 and my guess is that I would have accumulated 6-8 weeks, at most, and perhaps less than that. But I am not sure that I like being that close to a negative metric like that. :)
     
    jrbiz, Sep 18, 2014 IP
    sarahk likes this.
  10. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #10
    we have a 6 month limit
    I was a vegetarian practically the whole time I was there but they don't allow for that.
     
    sarahk, Sep 18, 2014 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  11. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    2,612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #11
    There will come a time when it is past the gestation period, so if you have survived that long, you don't have it and can donate blood again.
     
    jrbiz, Sep 18, 2014 IP
  12. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    2,612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #12
    Well, it is all over but the shouting (as my Dad used to say.) Scotland will remain in the U.K. for now, anyway. Thoughts or comments?
     
    jrbiz, Sep 19, 2014 IP
  13. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #13
    Thank goodness!
     
    sarahk, Sep 19, 2014 IP
  14. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,151
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Best Answers:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #14
    The UK's retribution? Political dissidents love to drag their countries into a chaos. But as the proverb I've just made up says: "Do not rebel against the tit that feeds you" I believe there will be some serious political repercussions in the months to come.
     
    qwikad.com, Sep 19, 2014 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  15. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,035
    Likes Received:
    2,612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #15
    Though it will need to be tempered by the fact that they will also be punishing the 55% who voted to stay.
     
    jrbiz, Sep 19, 2014 IP
  16. mytechiestuff

    mytechiestuff Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,862
    Likes Received:
    58
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    153
    #16
    The amazing thing was that every one in the UK almost found themselves almost sleepwalking into some thing that would have been a disaster for all concerned.
    There would have been major problems with the financial system for both the nations for years to come.

    The nuclear deterrent currently in Scotland would have bben "expelled" as per the promise by Scottish Nation Party creating uncertainty for UK and its allies including the US.

    The political system would have been in a hell of a mess due to complicated arrangements for changes promised by the SNP.

    Even the Union Jack, the British flag, which is a combination of the red cross on white of the St. George and the blue cross on white of the Scottish Saltire would have been changed!

    The thing was that no one in the political system in the UK thought that there was any chance that the Scots would want to breakup Great Britain!

    It was a very close shave.

    The pound soared against the Dollar at the news of the NO vote.

    That was not good for me but it was worth it :)
     
    mytechiestuff, Sep 19, 2014 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  17. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,500
    Likes Received:
    4,460
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #17
    Down in NZ we've been holding off the strident calls for a new flag because its just not worth the cost and upset as all the parties vie for dominance. It was pointed out that if Scotland had voted Yes we'd have been obliged to change it. That whole butterfly in Brazil causing a cyclone in Texas thing. Little did the people of Scotland know that a Yes vote would have caused huge political unrest in NZ.
     
    sarahk, Sep 19, 2014 IP
    jrbiz likes this.