Does Google and search engines view Blog (with dynamic pages) different from a static HTML site? What are the differences ? Which is better - A link on inner page of a blog or link on inner page of static HTML site?
As far as I understand it, they link would count as the same on most blog platforms because they use .php which is done server side before the spiders even spider the page. so to the spiders the links would look just the same.
good question, answer is yes, because i think they keep sending back the bots if its dynamic, but if its static its just a one time index.. but i'm not exactly sure to be honest
Nope static vs dynamic doesn't matter. The only difference between the two is that the search engines might find the link on the blog earlier. This is because websites that keep adding new content get spidered more often. I would base link value more on other factors such as PR, age of domain, alexa ranking, relevancy, number of links, position on page, etc. It doesn't matter about how often the spider comes back once they find the link the first time. They are not going to keep giving you credit for a new link everytime the spider comes back.
I agree on this line but i say either the blog or html page if it is new content the SEs definetly visits but i never tried this
I think google like blog the most but at the same time if the static html has better quality and has better SEO process, it will be rank higher too.
For the link juice, there is no difference. However, Google will go to your site much more often if its updated frequently, dosent matters if its .html or .php
Technically Blogspot posts are static pages with .html extensions. They use a database to store your posts and software to 'publish' your pages as static html. This is the same method that Yahoo Stores uses as well. Blogs do get indexed very quickly however. Sometimes within the hour of the post being pinged to services such as Technorati. You can also have new pages on a non-blog website get indexed fairly quickly if your homepage is updated on a regular basis. Frequent homepage changes will 'bait' the spiders appetite, and therefore call attention to any new link that is placed on it. As far as what type of page is better than the other for linking purposes? Neither is any better than the other. What matters is what is on the actual page. They will revisit any page, static or otherwise, to look for changes on the page. If the page does not change, the spider may alter the frequency of its visits. But it will still come back from time to time. Age of domain, relevancy of the page in relation to what the link is pointing at, number of outbound links on the page, and the position of the outbound link in proximity of the main content of the page. Ignore factors such as PR and Alexa Ranking. In the case of Alexa Ranking, ignore it altogether. Everyone knows this is about the most unreliable gauge in ranking a website out there.