I thought Kelly was axed by Iraqi's who thought him a liar after he had said there would be no war - and later confided to friend that if there was one he would be found dead in the forest.
Haha you watch a video by a dopey homosexual & take it as gospel Mind you, you pay alot of attention to that other one too.
Nope. Kelly was kiled because he was about to blow the lid off of Blair and his BS. Kelly was the man that knew too much, he had to be silenced. He would have blown the whole WMD lie wide open and they could not allow that to happen, so he was killed and it was made to look like a suicide. The illegal invasion went on unabated and that is why we are in the mess we are in now.
Do some reading on the subject GTech, your hero Bush needed the help of the UK to instigate his plan for the illegal occupation of Iraq and all the billions of dollars that come with it. Kelly could have blown the lid off of the whole thing, that is why he had to be killed. Do some reading before posting things like "bigfoot" to try and defend your corrupt terrorist hero. Thanks.
Except what I say. Everyone should believe me when I say anything on my personal site about World Domination and the Electric Future. I will attempt to attain those goals.
Why? Since you are so sure, you could easily just post a credible source. Anyone that wasn't lying, should be able to that, right? I'm giving you an open opportunity to own me. I don't give those very often. Will you make use of it?
Owning you is not the issue, I leave that to Edz. Take a good read of this, I will get more for you to peruse later today. http://www.guardian.co.uk/hutton/story/0,13822,1372077,00.html Blair knows who killed Kelly, the people controlling the illustrious poodle Blair ordered it. If Kelly had blown the true story (the complete lack of WMDs) then your lover Bush would have had a lot more difficulty in gaining support for the illegal invasion of Iraq. Kelly had to be killed, Halliburton, Bechtel and The Carlyle Group wouldn't have wanted it any other way.
OK, so now you are sort of back-pedalling. Above, you were sure. After asking for evidence (none provided that actually confirms), you introduce a new word called "probably." Do you believe this is the best example of honesty, or would this be more representative of dishonesty? This is speculation. Before, you were sure, not you are introducing speculation (personal opinion). What is the difference between a legal invasion and an illegal invasion? WMDs were found. You've sold your integrity over it many times because you value saddam more than your own credibility. In fact, just last week, I offered you one hundred dollars via paypal if you could prove that the WMDs that were found, were not actually found. An easy one hundred dollars and you wouldn't even try. Obviously you are not a man of honor. Now we're getting into a theory (of which is one of your fortes). You speculate he had to have been killed and introduce
Very well said -- I'm sure Tony & Cheri will be appearing on all sorts of celebrity show once his fame starts to diminish. I guess we (the British) only have ourselves to blame in allowing the cult of personality / celebrity to grow into the monster it is today.
Ah, these are the times when i think being the Prime Minister and getting hounded by people isnt bad after all. Let 5 years go by and i can make a nice emotional speech and make enough money put it in the bank and live like a king for the rest of my life.