Limousine! Yes Limousine (NOT COCK) is what "T.B. Bradley" (Theresa Bradley) was thinking when she filed: "Posted on U-Tube are first account witnesses of numerous males who describe in vivid detail acts of homosexual conduct with Defendant Obama in his big black limousine; and these males have come forward provide their faces and their statements on U-Tube that they have engaged in degrading acts of homosexual conduct with Barack Hussein Obama, Jr." (Doc 23) ( pg 5 ) (item #13) "Defendant Obama has perpetrated upon fraud upon the American people by engaging in depraved homosexual acts in his big black limousine - homosexual acts described by males posted on U-Tube describing in vivid detail engaging in oral sex with Defendant Obama" (Doc 23) ( pg 8 ) (item #26) "This nation and its great people deserve better than homosexuals placing themselves and describing on U-Tube degrading homosexual acts in vivid detail that they engaged in upon Defendant's (Obama) solicitation in the back of Obama's big black limousine parked on the seedier sides of Chicago" (Doc 23) ( pg 11 ) Berg vs Obama http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...sylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/23/0.pdf - Of which Phil Berg signed off on. Folks, i hate to point out the obvious but Phil Berg & this lawsuit is a fucking joke. Not only is Phil Berg a fucking idiot, he's an idiot that's been sanctioned before: Lawyer Slapped With $10K in Sanctions for 'Laundry List of Unethical Actions' Finding that a Pennsylvania lawyer had committed a "laundry list of unethical actions," a federal judge has imposed more than $10,000 in sanctions and ordered the lawyer to complete six hours of ethics training. http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1122023117263 I couldn't help noticing that T.B. Bradley's contact address varies depending on the document she filed. Why would that be? So what have we learned? Theresa Bradley is seeking enlarged black penis & Phil Berg could possibly be disbarred for this. But don't listen to me, make sure to visit Phil Berg's website: www.obamacrimes.com Personally speaking it wouldn't surprise me if PA doesn't have the balls to have him disbarred but i would be a bit surprised if he wasn't sanctioned again. Wrapping it up quickly: - JKE
Hollister vs Soetoro (Berg vs Obama, Round II) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judge Robertson: "..any attempt to sanction them for misuse of the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to this case would only give them a forum to continue their provocation." "Mr. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce, an attorney who lives in Tucson, Arizona, signed the complaint in this case. (They have been filing electronically although they have not been admitted pro hac vice, see [#10].) They are agents provocateurs –- and any attempt to sanction them for misuse of the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to this case would only give them a forum to continue their provocation." http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/21/0.pdf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Judge Robertson: " The real plaintiff is probably Philip J. Berg, a lawyer who .. has pursued his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama " "..lives in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, and who has pursued his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008), invoking the civil rights statutes, the Federal Election Campaign Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the law of promissory estoppel." "Mr. Hollister is apparently Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm, essentially a straw plaintiff, one who could tee Mr. Berg’s native-born issue up for decision.." ".. on a new theory: If some “value†could be assigned to the “duties†the plaintiff thinks he might someday be called upon to fulfill under the Commander-in- Chief http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/21/0.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Berg Pimps Old Man with a bar card. That old man, John D. Hemenway. Hemenway: ".. During World War II, when only 17 (I am now 82).. " ".. I volunteered to enlist in the infantry of the Army of the United States as a private.." http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/25/0.pdf "Mr. Hemenway was not able to manage ECF log-in at the beginning of this lawsuit." http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/23/0.pdf ".. Attorney Hemenway did not have any expertise in ECF log-in or filings.." "Furthermore, as stated above, Attorney Hemenway did not have any expertise in ECF log-in or filings at the time the case was submitted to this Court and Attorney Berg was refused ECF log-in.." ------------------------------------------------------------- Who's Hollister? The 'real' plaintiff? Judge Robertson: "The plaintiff (Hollister) says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief (because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey orders from Barack Obama" http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/21/0.pdf Gregory S. Hollister. ------------------------------------------------ Judge Robertson: ".. they have not been admitted pro hac vice .." http://docs.justia.com/cases/federa...-columbia/dcdce/1:2008cv02254/134576/21/0.pdf Berg was never pro-hac'd in. nor was Lawrence J. Joyce Berg's name is on basically every document filed. Hemenway seems to drop disassociation hints. 'Evidence' filed was the same as before. An exception.. A brochure they filed: "Applying for Hawaiian Home Lands" Filed 3 times. Everything they filed, was filed 3 times. (you owe me ink) ---------------------------------------------- Judge Robertson: "This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do is to bring it to an early end" --------------------