i use auto submitter its better i think the way i do it lets say i got a thousands url to submit too. i use article rewrite software write a nice long comment spin a thousands time then i copy and paste it the software its a pain to do that but at least when i hit auto submit i no my comments are not duplicate. its takes about 5 hours the software to do its submissions you cant go wrong People
It makes no difference whether you use a piece of software like submiteaze or a web browser to submit. In case you haven't noticed, a web browser *is* a piece of software; it sends messages over an HTTP connection, just like a piece of submission software does. The directory sat at the other end of the wire doesn't know what has sent those messages. If you think it makes a blind bit of difference to submit using a web browser over using submission software then you're mistaken. It makes no difference. The big difference is that you spend hours submitting using a web browser, I spend a couple of minutes setting it up and then press one button. You'll notice that *everyone* who says 'manual is best' has no valid reason of *why* manual is best. Why? Because there is no valid reason, it makes no difference.
With that statement you've made it plainly obvious you're an amateur who doesn't have a clue what you're talking about. If it can harm your site then tell me this, why don't you do it for your competitors websites and 'harm' their websites? Exactly, you can't. Once again, you've proved the point in my last post "You'll notice that *everyone* who says 'manual is best' has no valid reason of *why* manual is best. Why? Because there is no valid reason, it makes no difference."
Automated tools in submission are a total no-no. I personally don't recommend it. They are often used for spamming. Nothing beats manual submission. You can submit faster by using auto-fill tools like Roboform.
lol! You're a bunch of idiots. Once again, people saying 'manual is best' but then providing no reason to back it up - it's perpetuated absolute BS! Tell me, why is manual 'best'? I've used submiteaze to submit my sites for YEARS and it works fine. If you're saying manual is best then I would bet my bottom dollar that you've not tried a submission tool like submiteaze. When i use it, i get the exact same submission confirmation email I get if it submit manually, and the same submission acceptance emails as I get when I submit manually. So tell me, why is manual 'best' when submission software achieves the exact same end result? The only difference is it take you many many hours to submit to over 1,000 directories - it takes me 5 minutes to setup the project and set it going. Same end result, just much faster. If you think manual is best carrying on wasting your time, I'll continue using submiteaze and do it in a fraction of the time, makes no difference to me!
No, I'm submitting my website details, the same as you would if you did it manually, so why is it spamming? The only difference is I'm using software to do it, that doesn't mean it's spam.
submiteaze works fine for me, that's all I care about. I know software submission works, it's your loss if you're not willing to try it.
i was thinking about using automated but after all ive read it sound like a bad idea, maybe just submit to the top 5 and know that they are accepted???
First of all, I want to say that do not submit website through any software. Please do directory submission manually. But if you really need it. So you can use the Fast Directory Submitter for this purpose.
@cigol_101: trust me it works absolutely fine. If you ask people on here who say "don't use", whether they've ever actually tried using software to submit, that they haven't and they don't have a clue what they're talking about, or they've simply heard someone else on here say "don't do it, it's bad" and just repeat it. I can say from first-hand experience that submitting using software works absolutely fine. It's 50 times faster and you get the same result at the end.