But all it takes is one person like Dude111 to believe him....AGS will then point him to one of his own websites where he can learn the "facts"....then its a little paper in the wallet... btw...did that just sound like a conspiracy theory??
Because steel framed builldings do not collapse into their own footprints like that mate. Did you actually see the state of WTC5 and WTC6?? They sustained far worse damage that WTC7 and didn't collapse. As I said before the building had to be destroyed at all costs, as it contained far too much damning evidence for it to remain standing.
Depends on the design and the circumstances. Your statement in itself is useless. I will tell you why.. You don't base your statement on anything, even if you say.. other steel framed buildings have not collapsed as straight down as WTC7. You might think it's suspicious, but you're not interesting in finding out why it collapse, you want it to remain a demolition mystery, so when we explain why it could collapse as it did, you chose to ignore that. When it comes to collapses of buildings, they could variate a lot. Just because the collapse looks weird doesn't mean it's a CD. And I ceirtainly don't think it looks like a CD. Where's the demolition explosions for example? Where can you see the bombs going off? Why isn't there any seismographic evidence of bombs going off in WTC7? The fact that the majority of demolition experts disagree with you doesn't put you in any better position. No, what has this to do with WTC7? Haven't checked them up, but what's the problem? They was constructed differently and got hit by debris differently too. Considering all cracks that was reported before the firemen pulled out, it was just a matter of time before that building would collapse. I have asked you lots of questions and only got a few answers.. can you improve that, thanks!
They were INSIDE the planes and killed the people INSIDE the buildings. I think that it was a Kerry/Edwards inside job. They wanted to make Bush look bad so they could run again.
All these conspiracy nuts are so racist. They're basically trying to convince us all that a bunch of white men are all super geniouses and that Arabs are so moronic they couldn't hit the broad side of a massive building with a jumbo jet.
i have one question that has me puzzled and that is about the cell phone calls are these calls made to family made from flight 93 are done with regular cell phones or special phones in the plane?
Don't know that one....but mythbusters proved that cellphones don't interfer with airplane equipment....I would assume most were made with the inflight phones, since cell towers arn't easily picked up that high....however, a sat phone could have easily been used, and there are more and more of these around....
i don't know how many people called. i don't know if they could all have had sat phones. i don't know if they all used inflight phones. and if they paid for it and if there is an evidence of the cc charge for using it. don't really know how it works i don't think you can use regular cell phone in mid air for the reson you stated. so if some one can clear that up?
i guess that only matters if you believe the ground zoomed up 20,000 feet to collide with the plane. not true. you can make calls from a phone at altitude. its been shown to work. some phone work, some dont. also, since the plane wasn't always at altitude (the ground didn't zoom up to meet the plane), during its decent, its perfect possible to get even more signal as it descended.