Banned From Adsense hypocrites !!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by phantom, Feb 22, 2007.

  1. #1
    First off I was banned from adsense and it's because of this that it got me thinking.
    I'm not so much pissed from being banned from adsense as I am pissed knowing that Google has also stolen money not just from me but from every tax paying American! Think I am joking? Read on....

    Here is how it transpired. I got the dreaded email from Google saying my account was closed due to "Fraudulent clicks" just like everyone else who has got banned....even though I have no idea what they are talking about.

    I tried the appeal process ( which is just filling out a dumb form) and of course was still denied. Not only denied but also an email saying I can never join again.....essentially saying not just "no" but "Hell No"!

    So I was banned from adsense fine I can deal with that.

    That is ok I am not mad for getting banned I'll figure out something else. They gotta do what they got to do.

    Then I started to think a little bit and here comes the real reason why I am pissed and why I am writing about this here. The real reason and why I am pissed is because I just figured out how hypocritical this "Google" Company really is.

    Here is why:
    There was an episode of "Lou Dobbs" on a couple days ago. A segment of that show was about how large corporations in America were receiving funds from the government as "small businesses". Google was one of these companies receiving funds and they are a multi-billion dollar company!

    So in effect Google is receiving money fraudulently. And guess what?....That is American tax payer's money that they get!

    So basically Google is guilty of "Fraudulent clicks".

    When you get banned from adsense supposedly Google gives back the money you earned on your Publisher account back to the Advertisers. So my question is..How does the American people get their tax paying dollars back?


    What a bunch of hypocrites! Give me my tax dollars back!


    With all that said, I am banning Google.


    Here is something else to think about:

    Something is seriously wrong with a company who runs one of the worlds largest supercomputers that can't manage to detect multiple clicks from the same IP and compensate or adjust for it.

    Companies like Bidvertiser do it so I don't think its an overly complex algorithm to figure out.

    Or maybe just maybe Google does this banning stuff on purpose and keeps all that money.......never refunding it to the publishers....Hell the took our tax dollars when they didn't really need it so I wouldn't put it past them.

    For all those sticking with adsense as a revenue generator.....don't say I didn't warn you.

    I already blogged this HERE
    If you are pissed about this as much as I am then feel free to Digg and Stumbleupon that article to help get the message out.

    Google you can keep the funds in my Publisher account but I want my tax dollars back!
     
    phantom, Feb 22, 2007 IP
    sachin410 likes this.
  2. leandar

    leandar Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,929
    Likes Received:
    108
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    170
    #2
    Thats why google is ugly
     
    leandar, Feb 22, 2007 IP
  3. ichigo

    ichigo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    116
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #3
    dont worry, ypn will be release soon and turn looks promising.
     
    ichigo, Feb 22, 2007 IP
  4. netjobs

    netjobs Banned

    Messages:
    1,442
    Likes Received:
    104
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Another terms shows there should be no Made For Adsense sites and still out there 1000's of MFA sites and they never banned for that...
     
    netjobs, Feb 22, 2007 IP
  5. phantom

    phantom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #5
    checking out turn thanks.

    But do you guys see my point that Google is also guilty of Fraudulent Clicks but with your Tax dollars?
     
    phantom, Feb 22, 2007 IP
  6. patataur

    patataur Peon

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Not for me and many others who are not us citizens.
     
    patataur, Feb 23, 2007 IP
  7. thedark

    thedark Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    168
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #7

    if you want to make a better use of your tax dollars, next time be more carrefull when voting for president.
     
    thedark, Feb 23, 2007 IP
  8. papek

    papek Peon

    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Harder to get adsense account twice than a president two turns nowdays.
     
    papek, Feb 23, 2007 IP
  9. phantom

    phantom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #9
    Your probably right, America never sends other countries any money. We have to save it to help our Katrina victims. :) Oh Except Iraq .....We pump in Billlions to there............and as you can see it's going really well there. We created many new jobs for bomb manufacturers.





    That is a true statement however...unfortunately, the president is not to blame for this one. The Small Business Administration is to blame for this.
     
    phantom, Feb 23, 2007 IP
  10. Set

    Set Peon

    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Think again. Google could receive funds when it was a small company. Even if they received such funds from the US government that was a good investment. Now they are multi-billion company and they pay taxes of much greater scale that the funds they might have received in the past.

    I think that's not a trouble for them to detect and compensate fraudulent clicks. They simply don't want to play the "the cat and the mouse" game with dishonest publishers who will constantly try to deceive their system using more and more complex methods. They ban on the spot just to ensure statistically the lowest fraud ratio (thus their payments are so good).
    It's the other story that chances are for a honest publisher to be banned if one gets click-attacked or gets some bad traffic.
     
    Set, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  11. phantom

    phantom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #11
    To the first paragraph my reply is - No this story was on Lou Dobbs that Google among others ARE still receiving funds even though they are not still a small business. Yes it did start when they were small 20 years ago but the idiots in the Small business administration are still giving them money and Google being greedy still accepts the funds. That was the story on CNN Lou Dobbs a few days ago


    To the second paragraph my reply is - Dude, that completely does not make sense ...you are saying they have the ability but choose not too? God forbid their little Supercomputer had to play a "cat and mouse game" type of algorithm to see how many times a click came from a certain IP or user or session or ad block......Sounds to me like they are not investing all that government funding into making things run smoother. To make a statement like that I can only guess that you must be a Google employee since you know exactly how it all works.
     
    phantom, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  12. Set

    Set Peon

    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    1) I'm not from the US so I'm really not bothered by this. But if some "Small business administration" of yours are still giving them money to support their "small business" that's funny (at least for me as non-US citizen).

    2) Well they do compensate for invalid accidential clicks. But if there are too many of them or there is some serious anomaly in the click statistic for your site they will not continue compensating but simply ban your account.

    The worse thing is the smallest publisher you are, the more vurnerable - statistic works well only with large numbers.
     
    Set, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  13. picouli

    picouli Peon

    Messages:
    760
    Likes Received:
    89
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Think twice - most of the American deficit is funded with European and Asian (China + Japan) money. ;)
     
    picouli, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  14. EmmSee

    EmmSee Peon

    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    What a pain man ...

    Do you mind questioning how much you made (daily or monthly average) with your banned account?

    I'm always trying to see how much publishers that get banned for these unknown "fraud clicks" are making at the time.
     
    EmmSee, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  15. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #15
    I know about their small business status. I think the government is trying to change that to reflect their true status, which is that of a multi-billion company, possibly to become the most valuable company in history within a few years time. Their rapid growth in the last few years probably caught the government napping.:D
     
    qwestcommunications, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  16. phantom

    phantom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #16

    I was only making about $8 bucks a day. So you you see it's not the money I am concerned about it's the point that they can say it is because of "fraudulent clicks" (with no proof) and ban me yet still be taking taxpayer's money from the SBA to fund their "small Business".

    Just because our government is too stupid not to realize Google is no longer a small business doesn't matter...Google knows they no longer need the money of taxpayers to help fund their business. Yet they still accept it. That to me is the equivalent of "Fraudulent Clicks" or worse because it is proven.
     
    phantom, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  17. blogster

    blogster Peon

    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    another screwed up account.....no comments
     
    blogster, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  18. jackburton2006

    jackburton2006 Peon

    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    282
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    This thread is a riot. It starts with some guy getting banned from Adsense, and instead of just moving on, he discovers a vast Adsense-U.S. Government conspiracy is to blame, then devolves into a bunch of foreign nutjobs bashing the American Government and the President. LMAO.

    Move on and stop wallowing in your paranoia.
     
    jackburton2006, Feb 24, 2007 IP
  19. phantom

    phantom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #19
    Dude you appear to be the "nut job" because no one ever said there was a "Government conspiracy to blame" except you.

    I was just trying to point out how hypocritical Google is for banning people for "Fraudulent Clicks" when they are guilty of the same (accepting money that is not theirs).

    If you don't have anything on topic to say in this thread then maybe YOU should just move on.
     
    phantom, Feb 25, 2007 IP
  20. thedark

    thedark Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    168
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #20
    i think this thread should be closed, just another adsense account banned... and nothing more.
     
    thedark, Feb 28, 2007 IP
    ottodo likes this.