Backlinks can hurt you!

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by enQuira, Mar 3, 2006.

  1. jestep

    jestep Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    215
    Best Answers:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    330
    #41
    I would say that about sums it up perfectly for more than one reason.
     
    jestep, Mar 5, 2006 IP
  2. Yahoo!Guy

    Yahoo!Guy Peon

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #42
    :) thanks for your post. You have some right things , really it is very important.

    Working algorythmically can create wrongs; especially for this subject. :(

    But I just had the same thing " Google can't know whether a link is paid or not unless they see paids' invoice. " :)
     
    Yahoo!Guy, Mar 5, 2006 IP
  3. Old Welsh Guy

    Old Welsh Guy Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    291
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #43
    Nor do they care LOL

    ALL google care about is relevancy of results.

    Google have massive data about social networking from orkut. They have mountains of data on link patterns that they can cross refer to. They can tweak their algos based on this, as social networking patterns in Orkut will likely be no different to patterns in the natural linking of web pages. Anything that steps out of that pattern can then be flagged.
    This is just me letting my Sunday mind run off a little.
     
    Old Welsh Guy, Mar 5, 2006 IP
    mad4 likes this.
  4. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #44
    Have you not been paying attention to AdSense ads on a forum like this? Watch how quickly they respond to changes in the direction of a thread and any doubts you have about Google's ability to determine content and relevancy should vanish completely.

    Now, note to everyone reading this thread:

    Please go back and re-read all of Old Welsh Guy's posts here. Carefully this time.

    Okay. Now go back and re-read them all one more time. Fix the concepts in your head.
     
    minstrel, Mar 5, 2006 IP
  5. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #45
    Google are always saying that they reward 'natural linking' and for them to keep saying this we have to assume that they are pretty good at spotting natural and unnatural links.

    The points raised in this thread by Old Welsh Guy about google spotting paid links can equally be applied to making sure your reciprocal or 3 way links are getting the maximum value.

    Rather than getting site wide footer links (which could never be natural could they?) or 'orphan' links (links just stuck on the page with no relevant text nearby to justify them) you should concentrate on building links within the content of the page for maximum value. Even if these are reciprocal at least they look like natural links.

    I don't think google care about whether money may have changed hands as much as they care about trying to algorithmically reduce the impact of unnatural links - paid or unpaid.
     
    mad4, Mar 5, 2006 IP