Backlink Chart -- Check it Out!

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by liamizdabest, Nov 2, 2008.

  1. #1
    liamizdabest, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  2. greatme

    greatme Active Member

    Messages:
    789
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #2
    It's looking very good. but i think google count backlinks very differently & changes their algo many times.
     
    greatme, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  3. tjankus

    tjankus Banned

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    interesting chart, but how these numbers were acquired?
     
    tjankus, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  4. JessieJames27

    JessieJames27 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,652
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #4
    I already saw it before. :D Thanks for sharing it again. I'm just confuse with those numbers, they are similar to multiplication table.
     
    JessieJames27, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  5. radya

    radya Peon

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I have try that on my site.
    Page rank need more link than links number on that chart.
    Also, you need to count how many outbound link your site has.
     
    radya, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  6. cnvseo

    cnvseo Guest

    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I think, with numbers of backlinks quality also matters.

    For example if some site has 555 backlinks and with less quality links, and one site has 400 link with high quality than what will be important for PR?
    IMO 400 backlinks will grab more PR.
     
    cnvseo, Nov 2, 2008 IP
  7. seohelp

    seohelp Peon

    Messages:
    529
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    how can i believe that this information will work for all ? and what is the genuinity of this chart ? how you define this ?
     
    seohelp, Nov 2, 2008 IP