1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Backend Database Mysql Or Msql

Discussion in 'Databases' started by dsmlacctv, Jan 24, 2013.

  1. #1
    heloo everyone we going to purchase a new retail management system for our retail business. we have chain store , the software which we are going to purchase is coded in vb.net (.net 2.0) and it uses mysql database for datbase operations. could anyone suggest me that how much mysql will be reliable over msql in next 5-7 years. we should go for mysql or not
     
    dsmlacctv, Jan 24, 2013 IP
  2. elfguy

    elfguy Member

    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #2
    Both MySQL and MSSQL are top-end databases that will work fine. Reliability usually is not a factor. MySQL runs mostly on Unix systems, while MSSQL runs on Windows servers. They also have different extensions and 3rd party solutions available for them. Your choice should be decided on which platform you want to use, not reliability.
     
    elfguy, Jan 25, 2013 IP
  3. dsmlacctv

    dsmlacctv Greenhorn

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    #3
    we will use Linux as our back-end server, and client will use windows systems. where MySQL stands for security perspective.
     
    dsmlacctv, Jan 25, 2013 IP
  4. Rukbat

    Rukbat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    37
    Best Answers:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    125
    #4
    Most Linux servers won't run .net programs, since .net is a Microsoft thing. (Some will have the capability, but I wouldn't count on it.)

    Unless you mean that the client is running a vb.net program and the server is running something else (PHP?). In which case, you probably have no choice. Unless you own the server, of course, in which case the choice is paying for MSSQL or using MySQL for free.

    As far as security is concerned, that's up to the programmer writing the server-side code, it has almost nothing to do with the database, unless someone gains physical access to the server. In which case your security is totally compromised, and you need better locks on your building.
     
    Rukbat, Jan 25, 2013 IP
  5. Tom-Brown

    Tom-Brown Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #5
    MySQL has become more of the standard database software due to it's wide use and the fact it's free. It will also run on pretty much every platform.

    Unless you have specialist reasons to MSQL, use MySQL.
     
    Tom-Brown, Jan 27, 2013 IP
  6. Irop Paze

    Irop Paze Active Member

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #6
    MySQL is very secure. If you are going to run Linux then I would go with MySQL, if you are going to use windows as your backend server I would still run MySQL
     
    Irop Paze, Jan 27, 2013 IP
  7. jonrod

    jonrod Member

    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #7
    Should go for MySQL. That's what we're using in most of our 'database' related projects.
     
    jonrod, Jan 28, 2013 IP
  8. diawilliam

    diawilliam Peon

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    #8
    I think you should go for MySQL as it has numerous great features that you won't find in SQL. The best part about MySQL is that it is open source and supported on atleast two dozen platforms.
     
    diawilliam, Feb 7, 2013 IP
  9. Sergey Turin

    Sergey Turin Greenhorn

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    #9
    How large your database and what capacity are you need?
     
    Sergey Turin, Feb 7, 2013 IP
  10. TestingWhiz1

    TestingWhiz1 Member

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #10
    Personally I would suggest Mysql for smooth running on Linux
     
    TestingWhiz1, Feb 8, 2013 IP
  11. icecube media

    icecube media Greenhorn

    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #11
    According to me you should go for MySql because it is more reliable.
     
    icecube media, Feb 11, 2013 IP
  12. pom4ik

    pom4ik Greenhorn

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #12
    MySql is open-source and from what I understand does not have any restrictions. If your system is high traffic you might have to look into MSSQL Standard or Enterprise, it will cost you $$$$$:)

    I come from a .net background so i usually go with mssql

    cheers
     
    pom4ik, Feb 12, 2013 IP
  13. Irop Paze

    Irop Paze Active Member

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #13
    Your understanding is flawed. Oracle now owns MySQL and if its good enough for a company that is on the Forbes Most Powerful Brands list then it must be legit.

    Open source and free [true] - You get what you pay for [false]
    Closed source and expensive [true] - You get what you pay for [false]
     
    Irop Paze, Feb 12, 2013 IP
  14. dsmlacctv

    dsmlacctv Greenhorn

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    #14
    thnx guys got the right answer. MySQL will be good for us
     
    dsmlacctv, Feb 14, 2013 IP
  15. tyteen4a03

    tyteen4a03 Member

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    45
    #15
    Also, consider MariaDB. It is a drop-in replacement for MySQL (i.e just replace the binaries on an preexisting installation works), and it is faster than MySQL.
     
    tyteen4a03, Feb 19, 2013 IP
  16. Irop Paze

    Irop Paze Active Member

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #16
    Looks a little too new for me to put into production.
     
    Irop Paze, Feb 19, 2013 IP
  17. tyteen4a03

    tyteen4a03 Member

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    45
    #17
    It has been here for a while (after oracle bought sun), and wikipedia uses it (with some nice performance boosts).
     
    tyteen4a03, Feb 20, 2013 IP
  18. Irop Paze

    Irop Paze Active Member

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #18
    It's been around for a few years, but the 1st stable code only came out early this year.

    True that wikipedia and some other predominate organizations use it, but they probably have database engineers or at least people that know how to address or mitigate vulnerabilities in databases. Since databases aren’t my speciality, I wouldn't feel comfortable using it in my production environment or advising someone else to use it. That's all I'm saying.

    I will however dump it into the lab to try it out.
     
    Irop Paze, Feb 21, 2013 IP