Hi all, I'd be glad about feedback for my web site analysis service. To try it out, simply enter a URL and press "Check" at: webmastercoffee.com/en/ The service tries to find out the technologies of a web site. It is looking for its CMS (content management system), its plugins and style, for often used scripts, for the cookies it sets, for the tracking means it is using and lots more. It is also giving advice when it sees typical errors, that could harm the search engine visibility of the site (SEO advice). And last but not least it gives a detailed keyword analysis. The analysis comes in a summary plus in more detailed simple written explanations. The service comes from Germany and you might find the one or other text still being german. I'd like to apologize for any inconvenience possibly caused by this. We improve the systems daily, to get it better. I hope you like the site. Your feedback is highly appreciated! Many greetings Mart
Hello, I visited your website. I'll start with the positives. #1, The site is simple and easy to navigate. #2, Your website loads quickly. This is very good news. Not everyone has the patience to wait and play. #3, Your site offers some useful content. Example, keyword target and density. This is good news for webmasters. You also explain in well written terms the true meaning of SEO. The only negative I see in regards to your website? The color and logo. I think the design could use a more professional look. To be honest with you, the design does not catch the eye.
Your website provides useful information and I consider it a valuable contribution. It doesn't seem to rate inner pages or posts differently than the home page. The Yellow color is a bit distracting and I'm not sure why you have images of tractors on a farm in the header.
Thanks a lot! I do understand that the design needs a complete overhaul. I plan to get the new one live when moving from "beta" to the final version of the service. @raz, I was really glad to hear your remarks; in fact I'd been giving great care to get it simple and speedy. But you know, one so often tries and still fails - so your comment made my day... @spider, glad you like it, thanks! About the inner pages, they should yield the same results when using the same technologies. E.g., when the title page of a site is using a blog the, then analysis of the title page should show a blog. And if an inner page uses a board system it should show on the analysis of that page. The keyword analysis should change in both cases, though. The tractor was some kind of random choice, and not a good one as I see now... (the idea was to show, that the use of a tool is to be preferred in some situations; as when harvesting a field, or when analysing a site)